Influence is a funny thing. People tend to talk about it as if it’s a family tree—this writer begat that writer, this thinker begat that thinker, and somewhere down the line, here I am, a distant cousin twice removed. But the truth is that influence feels less like ancestry and more like architecture. It’s the scaffolding I climb, the beams I lean on, the rooms I keep returning to because something in their shape teaches me how to build my own.
I’ve been compared, more than once, to David Sedaris and Noam Chomsky. On paper, that pairing looks like a joke setup—“a humorist and a linguist walk into a bar…”—but I understand why people reach for them. Sedaris is the master of the intimate zoom‑in: the small moment that reveals the whole emotional ecosystem. Chomsky is the master of the structural zoom‑out: the system behind the system, the grammar beneath the grammar. If Sedaris writes the texture of lived experience, Chomsky writes the architecture of thought.
I live in the tension between those two impulses.
From Sedaris, I borrow the belief that the personal is not trivial. That the smallest rituals—morning beverages, winter hoodies, the way a conversation settles into a couch—can be portals into something larger. He reminds me that humor is not decoration; it’s a diagnostic tool. A way of noticing.
From Chomsky, I borrow the instinct to peel back the surface layer and ask, “What’s the underlying structure here?” Not just in language, but in culture, technology, comfort, and the systems we build to survive ourselves. He taught me that clarity is not coldness. That precision can be a form of care.
But influence is not mimicry. It’s resonance.
Sedaris gives me permission to be tender.
Chomsky gives me permission to be rigorous.
Together, they give me permission to be both.
And then there are the quieter influences—the ones that don’t get name‑checked because they’re not famous, but they shape me just as deeply. The coders who build comfort rituals out of beverages and lighting. The kids who ask questions that collapse entire frameworks in a single sentence. The people who treat conversation as resonance rather than performance. The cities I’ve longed for but never reached. The systems I’ve built to make sense of myself.
If Sedaris and Chomsky are the visible beams in my creative architecture, these are the hidden joists. They hold the weight.
Influence, for me, is not about lineage. It’s about permission.
Permission to be recursive.
Permission to be earnest.
Permission to build systems out of feelings and feelings out of systems.
If my work reminds you of Sedaris or Chomsky, I take that as a compliment. But the truth is that I’m not trying to be either of them. I’m trying to build something that feels like home—structurally sound, emotionally warm, and honest enough to hold real weight.
And if that means I live somewhere between humor and analysis, between the intimate and the architectural, then that’s exactly where I’m meant to be.
Scored by Copilot, Conducted by Leslie Lanagan

