It was supposed to be a night of Hollywood cheer — Conan O’Brien’s Christmas party, the kind of gathering where reputations are polished and grievances are tucked discreetly behind velvet ropes. But in the corner of that room, beneath the twinkling lights and the laughter of the industry’s insiders, a rupture occurred. Nick Reiner, son of Rob and Michele, erupted in a fury that would later be read not as a passing quarrel but as the opening act of tragedy.
Hours later, the Brentwood house — a sanctuary of liberal Hollywood lineage — became a crime scene. Rob Reiner, the director who gave us A Few Good Men, and Michele, his wife of decades, were found stabbed to death. Their daughter Romy discovered them, a tableau of horror that no family should ever inscribe into memory. The police moved quickly, and by dawn Nick was in custody, his bail revoked, his name now etched into the scandal ledger of Los Angeles.
The details are lurid, almost cinematic. A hotel room in Santa Monica, blood on the bed, a shower streaked with red. The kind of evidence that prosecutors love, because it tells a story without words. And yet the words matter. The whispers from the party, the storming off, the forensic trail — all of it will be scrutinized, not just for what it proves but for what it suggests.
Hollywood has always been a stage for family drama, but rarely does the curtain fall this darkly. The Reiners were not just a family; they were a dynasty. Rob’s films, Michele’s presence, their circle of friends — all of it now reframed by the violence of their son. Addiction, once dramatized in Being Charlie, becomes not just a subplot but a haunting foreshadow. And in the broader cultural ledger, President Trump’s Truth Social post proved everything Rob had ever said about Trump was true — a bitter irony, a final confirmation from the very man who had been Rob’s foil.
In the clipped cadence of scandal, the arc is clear:
Suspicion at the party.
Evidence in the hotel.
Finality in Brentwood.
Irony in the Truth Social echo.
The case will move forward, the DA will file, and the tabloids will feast. But beneath the gossip lies something more enduring: the collapse of a family whose name was synonymous with Hollywood liberalism, now synonymous with tragedy.
Dominick Dunne would have recognized the pattern instantly. The glittering party, the whispered fight, the blood in the hotel, the bodies in Brentwood, and the political echo from Truth Social. A story not just of crime, but of culture — where privilege, addiction, rage, and irony converge, and where the final act is written not in dialogue but in silence.
It was Brentwood again. That manicured enclave of Los Angeles where the hedges are high, the gates discreet, and the stories that seep out are darker than the sunshine suggests. On December 14, 2025, Rob Reiner — actor, director, son of Carl, brother of Penny — was found dead in his home. His wife, Michele Singer, beside him. Random violence, the police say. At this point, that is all we know.
Brentwood has always been a paradox. A neighborhood of serenity and wealth, yet forever linked to rupture. Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman in 1994. Marilyn Monroe decades earlier. And now, Reiner. The streets are quiet, but the whispers are loud.
Reiner was 78. He was Hollywood royalty, though he never wore the crown ostentatiously. From “Meathead” on All in the Family to directing The Princess Bride, Stand By Me, and When Harry Met Sally, his career was a catalogue of American culture. He was the son of Carl Reiner, whose wit defined television, and the brother of Penny Marshall, whose laughter and films carried into every living room. Together, they were a dynasty.
The irony of his death is unbearable. A man who spent his life crafting stories about love, friendship, and justice, felled by the very chaos his art resisted. Hollywood is a town of masks and façades, but Brentwood is its most notorious stage. Behind the hedges, behind the gates, lives unravel in ways that shock the world.
The industry will mourn. Tributes will pour in. Colleagues will recall his warmth, his precision, his humor. But beneath the eulogies lies the darker truth: violence does not discriminate. It intrudes, uninvited, into the lives of the good as easily as the guilty.
Reiner’s films remain. A Few Good Men still demands truth. Stand By Me still whispers of friendship’s endurance. The Princess Bride still insists on love’s persistence. The art is continuity; the death is rupture. And Brentwood, once again, is the setting for a story that will not fade.
What daily habit do you do that improves your quality of life?
What really helps me is a place of my own. I think about it all day, every day. About how in this house I have one. It is my space and no one is allowed in without permission. There is no social expectation on me to share my bed with anyone.
When Dana and I moved to Houston, not long after I realized that our house was huge enough for Dana and me each to have our own rooms, and I set it up that way. It didn’t have anything to do with my relationship with Dana. It had to do with the fact that we seemed to be exceptional at everything except sleeping next to each other. When I moved into my own room, I slept deeper than I had in years, and it made me a convert. One of the things you can do to make your relationship better is to sleep in separate beds as long as neither one of you are taking it personally. Dana definitely did take it more personally than I did, but also rolled with it, so at this point, I don’t know if my needing space was good for both of us or not. If It was too selfish, I apologize. Cosleeping is just not going to be a part of my life going forward. I have to take care of me in this way or I do not function well.
If Zac and I were on a relationship escalator, the thing that would work in his favor is that he has a huge house with many bedrooms and absolutely no expectation for me to be in his. I am betting that neither one would turn down the other’s invitation, however…….
That’s the difference. Right there. Even in a couple, you need to carve out room to still be the two individuals you used to be.When I could sleep better, I could handle having the rest of my identity being leslieanddana. It wasn’t the relationship I objected to. It was the cultural norm, thinking that there was something wrong with me because I didn’t want to sleep next to her every single night. So, I looked it up. Lots of couples suck at sleeping together, and sleep is too precious to waste.
Not cosleeping is dating energy. It’s as fresh and as hot as you want it to be… But that is my answer. It is not everyone’s. I’m not saying it’s the right way, just my way. At this point in time. I am both too young and too old not to know what’s coming down the pike. If I say never again, the next person I date is going to have a toddler that likes to sleep with his ass glued to my face. Never say never.
It has nothing to do with the way I feel about my current life… and everything to do with the way I sleep. I get night terrors, and I’d rather be alone. They don’t happen often, short and intense. I don’t think I’ve been with Zac long enough for him to see one, because if he did, he would have said something. That’s because I see him so rarely that sleeping next to him is a treat, not an obligation. If we were closer, the novelty would wear off. I can make it work for a night here and there, but in negotiating living with another partner, I need to know it is not demanded of me unless there are extenuating circumstances like a toddler sleeping with his ass glued to my face.
Although now I’m getting old enough that my partner’s kids would be teens/20s or there would be an age gap between us. Not that I am complaining about either thing. It’s just reality. The only thing of which I am certain is that if I do have children, I will not birth them. I know I am physically capable of carrying a child at 45 or 46, but I have no desire at all. Just put it in the negative numbers.
Thinking about the one thing I do every day- being safe in a space of my own- lets me branch out to an enormous degree. My thoughts can run wild because there’s no one to interrupt them (although interruption can be a good thing when I’m going down the wrong road). Being alone allows me to be a better writer because I am living in shifts. I am reacting and reflecting. To take away a space of my own limits rumination, certainly, but it also curbs creativity. I don’t just bitch in these sessions. I’m trying to figure out what’s signal and what’s noise.
For instance, I got a Facebook meme THIS MORNING bitching about the U2 album Apple put on their phones once. That was in 2013. As if that is the worst problem in your world….. to get FREE MUSIC (and if you didn’t want it, you could just delete it).
When I listened to that album, I found one of my favorite songs, “Every Breaking Wave.” Of course my favorite song of 2013 came from that album, but knowing why is above your pay grade. That’s an inside joke, and I know who will laugh when they get here. People who have real problems just roll their eyes at stuff like this, and that’s a large part of the joke.
I remember the conversation surrounding it- not funny until we ran the conversation into the ground a hundred times. Basically it was all about perspective. There’s conflict all over the globe, as well as hunger and a thousand other problems, but you’re cranked up because you lost maybe 150 MB on a 16 GB phone. What the fuck ever.
I have two paths of thought regarding this. The first is that there are so many problems in the world. Why is this something they remember over 10 years later? Alternatively, most people don’t like to get vulnerable. Bitching about U2 is infinitely easier than walking into your own valleys of vulnerability. Even then, I said something along the lines of “honey, I get it. The world is fucked up. But more today than yesterday?” Said person was also using the surface level to express fear and doubt about much bigger problems.
At the time, I was sort of going through a thing vicariously through someone else. A friend of a friend had been murdered. So, of course the U2 album was going to set them off. It was the right thing at the right time to blow off some steam.
It wasn’t that the world had become worse. Ours had.
I think about those kinds of memories all the time in the name of putting them down. I wake up every morning and reassess the day before, and it has been habit for 20 years. Although I haven’t always posted daily. I’m on my 61st or 62nd day of that, trying to get it ingrained as a habit. I was going to talk about writing every day vs. cosleeping, but two things about that. The first is sleeping alone informs everything else. I could not do what I do without rolling over and accessing my tablet first thing. The second is that I already have an entry called “This,” It asked about my collections, and these entries are it for me.
They don’t take up space. In my room.
And now, without further ado, the best thing that came out of the worst thing that Apple has ever done, apparently:
My review of Pancake Money did get published, and I couldn’t be happier. I also got some great feedback from the editorial board for next time. It was about organization and flow, but they also said your review was well-written, thought-provoking, and insightful. I’ll take it.
As I told my editor, I think I was just too careful in a lot of ways, because I didn’t want to spoil anything. Writing a plot summary seemed like a bad idea, only because you never know which string you pull will unravel the whole sweater. It’s not that plot summaries are bad for any book…. just this one, and other thrillers like it. Something I think of as innocuous might lead the reader to figure out “whodunit” by chapter 2…. and Finn Bell did such a great job of intricately weaving this mystery that I’d be mortified to ruin it for someone else. See, what happens is…………………
The best part about the book is that pretty much anyone could be the murderer. There are clues that point you in all kinds of directions unless you are critically thinking and just trying to spoil it for yourself before the end; this is something I definitely do not recommend. As I said in the review, just enjoy the ride. You’ll know soon enough. Even then, you won’t want it to end. It’s a cool little world Bell has created.
I will say that the priests being murdered are killed with exquisite detail. It is quite grisly if you’re not used to reading these types of novels. I remember that I almost threw up while reading Dan Brown’s Angels and Demons, because one of the murdered had earth shoved down his esophagus. Or, at least, I think it was A&D. Dan Brown’s novels all run together for me. It’s a formula that’s made him millions, though.
I’ve read so many thrillers by now that the queasiness is not the issue here, Dude.
It feels good to have another one under my belt. I’ve already got the next book picked, but I want to finish Dead Lemons (another by Finn Bell) first. It’s another thriller, so I’m thinking it will only take me a couple of hours to read it. When you are so high on adrenaline, pages turn themselves. The protagonist/narrator in Pancake Money makes an appearance, and I can’t wait to find it. Apparently, he’s had quite the career change, going from Detective Bobby Ress to Father Bobby Ress. How this happens, I’m not sure, and that’s part of the fun.
Please, please, please buy these books. I MUST BE ABLE TO TALK TO SOMEONE WHO ALREADY KNOWS WHO KILLED WHOM!!!! My editor hasn’t started reading, and I want to be all like, “CHRIST, WHY HAVEN’T YOU FINISHED IT YET! I HAVE NEEDS, WOMAN!”
But I won’t. I’ll just spend that time pining for a screenplay, because Pancake Money would be a very good movie if it was done right, and by that I mean the exact interpretation I have in my own head, and if it is not that, it will be a bad movie.