A Long, Long Time Ago…

There are years in history that behave like doorways. Years that don’t just mark time but announce transition — the hinge between one era and the next. I was born in one of those years: 1977. A year that didn’t simply sit in the late seventies but seemed to lean forward, already reaching toward the future. A year humming with cultural ignition points, technological firsts, and the quiet tectonic shifts that would eventually reshape the world.

Because of that timing — because of the strange, liminal placement of my birth — I belong to a micro‑generation that has always lived in the in‑between. People later called us Xennials, those born roughly between 1977 and 1983. We’re the ones who had analog childhoods and digital adulthoods. We’re the ones who remember boredom as a landscape, not a crisis. We’re the ones who grew up with rotary phones and then learned to text in our twenties. We’re the ones who can navigate a library card catalog and a search engine with equal fluency.

We are, in a very real sense, the last generation to remember the world before the internet — and the first to grow into the world shaped by it.

To understand what that means, you have to understand the year itself. You have to understand what it meant to arrive in 1977, a year that reads like a prologue to the modern world. It was a year of mythmaking, technological birth, political recalibration, and artistic upheaval. A year where old worlds were ending and new ones were beginning, often in the same breath.

In May of that year, Star Wars premiered. Not the franchise, not the cultural juggernaut — just the first film, a strange, earnest space opera that no one expected to change anything. And yet it did. It rewired cinema. It reshaped storytelling. It introduced a new kind of myth, one that blended ancient archetypes with futuristic imagination. It’s fitting, in a way, that people born in 1977 grew up alongside a story about rebellion, empire, found family, and the tension between destiny and choice. Those themes would echo through our own generational experience.

Meanwhile, in January 1977, Apple Computer was incorporated. By April, the Apple II — one of the first mass‑market personal computers — was released. This wasn’t just a new gadget; it was the beginning of a new relationship between humans and machines. Computing was no longer the domain of institutions. It was becoming personal. For those of us born that year, this mattered. We were children when computers were still rare, teenagers when they became common, and adults when they became essential. We didn’t inherit the digital world; we watched it form in real time.

The Atari Video Computer System launched that same year, bringing video games into living rooms for the first time. It was the beginning of interactive media — worlds you could enter, not just observe. For a generation that would later navigate virtual spaces, this early exposure mattered more than we realized.

Music in 1977 was in a state of revolution. Disco was at its glittering peak. Punk was exploding in London and New York. Fleetwood Mac released Rumours, a masterpiece of emotional architecture. Elvis Presley died, marking the end of an era. It was a year where the old guard fell and the new guard rose, where culture was renegotiating itself in real time.

The world was shifting politically and socially as well. Jimmy Carter pardoned Vietnam War draft evaders. Snow fell in Miami for the first and only time. The Ogaden War erupted in the Horn of Africa. The Torrijos–Carter Treaties set the stage for the Panama Canal transfer. It was a world in motion — unstable, hopeful, and changing fast.

Science and space were expanding their reach. Voyager 1 and 2 launched in 1977, carrying with them the Golden Record — a message in a bottle for the cosmos. The rings of Uranus were discovered. Early computer graphics appeared in the Star Wars Death Star briefing scene. The future wasn’t just coming; it was already whispering.

Growing up in the wake of all this meant growing up in a world that was still analog, still slow, still tactile. Childhood was built from physical objects: cassette tapes, film cameras, paper maps, handwritten notes. You didn’t have infinite access to information; you had whatever was in your house, your school, or your local library.

We grew up with boredom — not as a crisis, but as a landscape. You waited for things: for your favorite song to come on the radio, for film to be developed, for your friend to call you back. You learned patience because there was no alternative.

We grew up with commitment. Calling someone meant calling their house. If they weren’t home, you left a message and waited. Plans were made and kept because there was no way to text “running late.” You learned to live with unanswered questions.

We grew up with physical media. Music came on vinyl, then cassette, then CD. Movies came on VHS. Photos lived in shoeboxes. Memories had weight.

We grew up without surveillance. There were no digital footprints. No social media archives. No constant documentation. You could reinvent yourself without leaving a trail.

This analog childhood shaped us — gave us grounding, texture, and a sense of the world as something you touch, not just scroll through.

And then the internet arrived.

But here’s the hinge: the internet didn’t raise us. It interrupted us. It crept in during adolescence — dial‑up tones, AOL chat rooms, early search engines. We were old enough to remember life before it, but young enough to adapt without friction.

We learned the digital world as it formed. We weren’t digital natives, but we weren’t outsiders either. We were apprentices. We learned HTML on GeoCities. We downloaded MP3s on Napster. We built our first identities in the early social web — MySpace, LiveJournal, AIM away messages. We grew into the digital world the way you grow into a new city: slowly, awkwardly, with a mix of wonder and skepticism.

By the time we entered the workforce, everything was changing — email, websites, mobile phones, globalization, the 24‑hour news cycle. We didn’t inherit a stable world; we inherited a world mid‑transformation. And because we had lived both realities — the analog and the digital — we became translators. Bridges. People who could see the seams.

People born in the late 70s and early 80s often describe themselves as having a dual operating system. We can live offline without panic, but we can also navigate digital spaces with fluency. We understand both scarcity and abundance. We remember when information was hard to find and when it became impossible to escape.

We’re old enough to remember the before times — card catalogs, busy signals, mixtapes, handwritten letters, the sound of a modem connecting, the first time we heard “You’ve got mail.” We remember when privacy was the default, not the exception.

We’re young enough to adapt to the after times — texting, social media, smartphones, streaming, cloud computing, the algorithmic world. We didn’t resist the future; we negotiated with it.

Our entire lives have been shaped by thresholds — analog to digital, local to global, slow to instantaneous. We were born into a world that was about to change, and we grew up alongside that change.

When I look at my own life — at the way I think, the way I observe, the way I metabolize experience — I can see the imprint of this generational hinge everywhere. I’m someone who reads spaces and eras like architecture. I’m someone who notices contrast — quiet apartment vs. lively lakehouse, analog childhood vs. digital adulthood. I’m someone who feels at home in the in‑between.

Being born in 1977 didn’t just place me in a particular year; it placed me in a particular relationship with time. I grew up with the last remnants of a slower world and the first sparks of a faster one. I learned to navigate both. I learned to translate between them. And that translation — that ability to hold two eras in my hands at once — is part of my creative scaffolding. It’s part of how I write, how I think, how I connect.

Xennials are often described as a bridge generation, and I think that’s true. But I think we’re more than that. We’re not just bridges; we’re interpreters. We’re people who understand that the world is always in motion, always in negotiation, always in the process of becoming something new. We know what it means to adapt. We know what it means to let go. We know what it means to remember.

We carry the analog world in our bones and the digital world in our hands. We are, in a very real sense, children of the threshold.

When I look back at the year I was born, I don’t just see historical events. I see a kind of personal mythology — a set of symbols and stories that echo through my own life. Star Wars and the idea of rebellion, found family, and mythmaking. The birth of personal computing and my own relationship with technology. The rise of interactive media and my love of immersive worlds. The cultural renegotiation of the late 70s and my own instinct to read systems, structures, and transitions.

It’s not that these events shaped me directly — I was an infant, after all — but they formed the atmosphere I grew up in. They set the tone. They established the architecture of the era that raised me.

Being born in 1977 means living at the edge of two worlds — the world that was and the world that would be. It means carrying both in your memory, your habits, your instincts. It means knowing how to wait and how to refresh. It means knowing how to write a letter and how to send a DM. It means knowing how to be unreachable and how to be always‑on. It means knowing how to live with mystery and how to Google anything.

It means understanding that the world is not fixed — that it can change, radically, quickly, and without warning.

And maybe that’s the real gift of being a Xennial: we’re not nostalgic for the past or dazzled by the future. We’re comfortable in the middle. We know how to hold both.

When I think about being born in 1977, I don’t think about it as trivia. I think about it as context — the backdrop against which my life unfolded. I think about it as a threshold year, a year that opened a portal into a new age. And I think about my generation — the Xennials — as the ones who walked through that portal with one foot still in the old world and one foot stepping into the new.

We are the hinge.
We are the seam.
We are the ones who remember and the ones who adapt.
We are the last analog children and the first digital adults.

And there’s something beautiful about that — something architectural, something resonant, something that feels like exactly the right place to have come from.


Scored by Copilot; Conducted by Leslie Lanagan

Strawberry Letter #23

Share what you know about the year you were born.

The number one hit by The Brothers Johnson in the title was at the top of the charts the day I was born. When the funk bass starts, and you move; if you have heard Louis start that vamp it’s still going on in your head right now……. so addictive that you might have to find another earworm to get rid of this one.

(Small aside- if you are a Louis Johnson fan (bassist), Thundercat is his heir apparent.)

I was delivered on September 10th, 1977, so for most of what happened during that year I was only marginally present. Jimmy Carter had just been inaugurated as president the previous January (election in ’76, the first presidential election since Richard Nixon resigned). As far as I can gather, it was not one of those years that had a huge historical event. It was a year in which we were recovering from being led by a criminal, which has no bearing on today.

There were smaller accomplishments.

The first official flight of the Concorde took off from JFK after having had several successful test flights. It cut travel time to London in half. Interestingly enough, cutting the flight time in half wasn’t the end goal. As I grew, the Concorde got better. Its fastest speed run from the US to the UK was 2:52:59, and then it was discontinued (thank God, for environmental reasons, yet still sad…… I don’t know why. I wasn’t buying tickets).

That wasn’t the only advance in business, though, because 1977 was one of the years in which personal computer companies were popping up everywhere. Instead of a mainframe and dumb terminals (like at the office), you could get a fully functioning machine that fit on your desk.

Kids, I’m taking a moment out to say that because things have changed so much, I am not sure that you’ll have a reference for this, so I’ll explain.

Before the personal computer, at an office you’d have what was called the “server room,” and every desktop monitor was reflecting what was going on in the server room. None of the desktop terminals functioned independently, similar to today, when it is impossible to use some apps without being connected to the Internet and for the very same reason- the processing is done on the web servers, not on your local device….. which is why a solid network connection is every bit as vital as the CPU/RAM/graphics card/etc. But back then, there was no “internet,” there was the intranet. The server you were connected to was physically located near you, because everything was a wired connection.

I do not think that the Internet would be what it is today if we hadn’t learned how to pipe data through a wireless connection. I believe this was possible because our drive to be wireless all the time came from internet connectivity through your cell. Having a basic web browser on a dumb phone led to everyone being connected, all the time, for better or for worse. But in 1977, we couldn’t see it coming yet. We were satisfied with creating documents and saving them to a floppy disk for easy carrying….. until you bent it…… and then, cell phones only supported calling. Short Messaging System (SMS) had not been invented.

We could not see the future, but how computers operate in 2023 is merely an evolution, it is not wildly different from anything we did back then. What we learned at networking an office turned out to be instrumental in how we network the whole world at once.

In terms of the world at the time, things were tense with the USSR, but in different ways than they are today…. the biggest reason is that the Soviet Republic fell apart, and now there’s only Russia. Any dreams they had of world dominance went with the republic’s collapse. They didn’t have the money to be big players anymore, and honestly, I don’t know that they have it now. As with American leaders, they make it look good….. but who knows what cards Putin is really holding?

(The answer is Hilary Clinton, btw. When the former Secretary of State to the most powerful nation in the world says Putin is masterminding our demise by having a Russian UI in the White House, you believe her. I’m sure your next question is “what’s a UI?” Useful Idiot- the stooge planted in a country who doesn’t do anything outright evil to show they’re being traitorous, just makes mistakes that are bad for American interests because they’re being manipulated by a foreign state. When we elected Trump, we learned that Russia thought they were getting a UI, then even they were surprised with 45 because there was so much emphasis on the “I,” not so much with the “U.” You get what you pay for……… I’m sure Putin thought it was marvelous when 45 went into CIA’s house and ripped them a new asshole. I didn’t. “Say that to Martin Freeman’s FACE.”)

Speaking of Hillary, I don’t know what she was doing in 1977, but I do know that it was near the beginning of of Hillary becoming a one-person monolithic idea of who a president’s partner should be; as such, it was the beginning of “damned if you do, damned if you don’t.” But the 70s would have been the beginning of social justice awareness, because back then was when the emphasis on social justice really took hold with white people. It’s not that there weren’t white people interested in social justice before, it’s that American Christianity divided in half, and the horseshoe of extremities divided into Evangelical white supremacy apologists and “the woke.” If white supremacy was good enough for Jesus, it’s good enough for everyone.

Except there is no way for Jesus to be a white supremacy apologist because the image painted of him in every white church in America looks like Jesus was the only French baby born in the Middle East, and at that time, it would have been a severe anomaly because people didn’t generally travel that far, first of all, and second it’s impossible for him to be white as as a descendent of Jesse and David. It was part of Matthew’s whole schtick. He was the captain in charge of “see? I told you he’s the Messiah. I’ve followed quite a few.” Kidding, but not inaccurate. Matthew focused on proof…. not of Jesus’ divinity as the actual son of God, but proving to Jews that he (waves hand) was the Messiah they were looking for.

But in the end, it wasn’t proof that mattered. It was “how do we appropriate Jesus’ culture and religion to fit our justified racism and inequality?” Thus, the Democrats eschewed religion and the cancer of racism spread into the Republican Party at an alarming rate, because they didn’t have to believe racism was wrong.

That’s not limited to the US, by the way. In the 1970s, they were also struggling with this very idea in South Africa. As Trevor Noah has pointed out, when South Africa came up with apartheid, they researched all the ways you could be racist, and took the worst of each system and applied it. Guess what? Most of the really evil stuff came from us.

If you remember nothing else about South Africa, it’s that Jim Crow laws are directly responsible for apartheid being implemented and maintained, because we built the system that had the largest impact on apartheid policies. So, the cancer that is Evangelical white supremacy spread and made South Africa malignant, too.

Even Thai people applaud Ho=Ho great job.

It was Barry Goldwater who warned us, and we didn’t like AuH2O, so we didn’t listen and now we’re fucked:

Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they’re sure trying to do so, it’s going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can’t and won’t compromise. I know, I’ve tried to deal with them.

Want to hear something really interesting? Goldwater was a progressive Republican, the people most lonely at parties. You cannot convince me otherwise if he also said, “you don’t have to be straight to be in the military. You have to be able to shoot straight.” Millions of gay men have said, “I can do that.” Despite it, “those preachers” became the voice of Christianity and people like Jimmy Carter, Barry Goldwater, and me are left out of the conversation.

I was telling a Facebook group who was, at the time, coming down hard on Evangelical colonialism through mission trips. I said, “I am a Jimmy Carter Democrat. I know that mission trips on the whole are problematic, but I’m a Jimmy Carter Democrat. I didn’t talk about faith, I helped build them a house.” I got emotionally pummeled into the ground. Par for the course. American Christianity as a whole does not like Jimmy Carter’s version of Christianity unless it’s a meme of him and not the rest of us.

Stephen Colbert said it better than the rest of us, the question we should have asked ourselves before we let the Republican Party become a theocracy:

If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn’t help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we’ve got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don’t want to do it.

So, if there’s anything good that came out of 1977, it’s that I got the liberal version of Christianity in the Methodist church…………….

Just like Hillary Clinton.