I have had hallucinations that would be interesting if they were filmed, but I’d want a good writer’s room. Mental health has to be treated with care and while I’m the subject, I need help with context. I wasn’t all there. Tiina can help with some of that, speaking as if this were a real project (it’s not). It’s really hard to see yourself in that place once the hallucination is past, because the context that made it feel real is gone. There’s only one writer I really want on my team that I cannot have because he’s busy, and that’s Zelenskyy.
He could make me feel comfortable about putting words and pictures to the distorted images in my head. I loved how he illustrated his own. “Servant of the People” is a masterpiece, and very much fits my vibe- serious, and absurdist.
Another movie is my childhood, because it is so different than how I live now. Northeast Texas in the 1970s-80s was a whole mood…. and that mood included white gloves and party manners.
Another movie would be my adulthood, because after my family left the church the structure was different and I wasn’t wearing a constant halo. It is not real. It is what other people project onto you as “The Preacher’s Child.”
Don’t worry, I was just as much of an asshole as your child.
And then there’s a movie about my life now. Tiina and I creating new projects. Brian and I working in the yard. Special time to myself with the kids so Brian and Tiina can have bandwidth. The excitement of feeling like my life is changing with Tiina’s new grandbaby….. because it’s not fantasy. My life is changing. That baby is coming and is going to be living in Tiina’s house and has MOOMIN GEAR OMG THIS IS NOT A DRILL.
1. Argo Some people unwind with baking shows. I unwind with a CIA exfiltration operation where everyone is sweating through polyester and lying to border guards. It’s competence porn. It’s historical drama. It’s “what if anxiety, but make it cinematic.” I’ve seen it so many times that if you muted the TV, I could still recite the dialogue like it’s the Nicene Creed.
2. Space Camp This movie imprinted on me like a baby duck. It’s the only film where NASA accidentally launches a group of teenagers into space and everyone just… accepts it. I watch it when I need to remember that I, too, can be launched into chaos and still land the shuttle. Also, it’s the only time in my life I’ve ever wanted a robot sidekick who would absolutely get me killed.
3. The Bourne Supremacy Not Identity. Not Ultimatum. Supremacy. The one where Jason Bourne is grieving, exhausted, and deeply done with everyone’s nonsense. I watch this movie the way some people meditate. It’s soothing to watch a man with no memory still outsmart the entire intelligence community while wearing a jacket from 2004. The pacing is so tight it could slice diamonds.
4. Select Episodes of The West Wing Not the whole series — I’m not trying to emotionally relive the Santos campaign arc every week. Just the episodes where Sorkin was caffeinated, righteous, and writing like he was being chased by a deadline with a baseball bat.
My rotation includes:
Two Cathedrals — the emotional equivalent of a cathedral‑sized mic drop.
17 People — the closest thing television has to a perfect bottle episode.
The Stackhouse Filibuster — because sometimes I need to believe in government for 42 minutes.
Shibboleth — the Thanksgiving episode with Chinese refugees, religious freedom, CJ and the turkeys, Charlie and the Paul Revere knife, and Bartlett doing theology with a carving set. It’s funny, moving, and morally grounded in that very specific West Wing way.
In This White House — the one where Ainsley Hayes obliterates Sam on live TV and then gets hired. This is where “Ginger, get the popcorn” lives, and I will never be over it.
These episodes are my emotional palate cleansers. They’re like intellectual sorbet.
5. Doctor Who — Specifically the 50th Anniversary Special I have seen “The Day of the Doctor” so many times that if the BBC ever needs a backup copy, I can just recite it from memory. It’s the perfect blend of:
time travel
trauma
redemption
banter
three men having an existential crisis in a room full of exploding paintings
It’s also the only episode where the show looks directly into the camera and says, “Yes, we know we’re ridiculous, but we’re also brilliant, so sit down.” I return to it because it’s mythic, emotional, and chaotic in exactly the right proportions — like a cosmic soup that somehow tastes the same every time.
If you ever want to understand a person, don’t ask them what they’ve watched. Ask them what they’ve watched five times.
These are the stories I return to when I need comfort, calibration, or the emotional equivalent of a weighted blanket made of plot twists. They’re not just rewatches. They’re rituals.
And yes, I will absolutely watch all of them again.
There are fonts that behave themselves, fonts that understand the room they’re in, fonts that arrive dressed appropriately for the occasion. And then there is Comic Sans, a font that wanders into formal spaces like a toddler in light‑up sneakers, sticky with juice, absolutely delighted to be here. Comic Sans is not malicious. Comic Sans is simply unaware of the emotional consequences of its own presence.
The story starts in 1994, inside Microsoft, where Vincent Connare was working on Microsoft Bob — a cartoonish, kid‑friendly interface featuring a talking dog named Rover. Rover delivered instructions in speech bubbles, but those bubbles were written in Times New Roman, a font that carries the emotional weight of a tax audit. Connare saw this and felt the same internal dissonance you feel when you see a clown smoking behind a circus tent. Something was wrong. A cartoon dog should not speak like a legal document. So he sketched a font inspired by comic books — rounded, bouncy, uneven, the typographic equivalent of a child’s handwriting on a birthday card.
And then the system hiccuped. Comic Sans wasn’t finished in time for Microsoft Bob’s release. The font missed its one correct habitat. But Microsoft, in its infinite 90s optimism, bundled it into Windows 95 anyway. Suddenly, a font designed for a cartoon dog was handed to millions of adults who had never once asked themselves what a font should mean. It was like releasing a domesticated parrot into the wild and being surprised when it started shouting human words at unsuspecting hikers.
Comic Sans began appearing everywhere it shouldn’t. Dentist offices. Church bulletins. Bake sale flyers. The front window of a vape shop. The sign taped to the microwave in the break room. It was always slightly sticky, slightly cheerful, slightly off. It was a font that believed every situation was a kindergarten classroom. It was a font that thought it was helping.
And then came the moment that changed me on a molecular level. I once saw Comic Sans on a sign in a federal courthouse. A courthouse — a building made of stone and echo and consequence. A building where the air itself feels like it has paperwork. And there, taped to a wall with the confidence of a font that had never known shame, was Comic Sans. My body reacted before my brain did. I felt my stomach drop. I felt my shoulders rise. I felt an ancestral warning flare in my spine. I nearly swallowed my backpack. It was the typographic equivalent of seeing a judge wearing Crocs.
Because fonts are emotional signals. They tell you how to feel before you’ve even processed the words. Comic Sans says, “This is for children.” It says, “There may be googly eyes nearby.” It says, “Snack time is at 2.” It does not say, “Please comply with the following instructions under penalty of law.” It does not say, “This building contains consequences.” It does not say, “We take ourselves seriously.”
Comic Sans is not the villain. Comic Sans is the wrong tool in the wrong room. It is context collapse. It is a symbol deployed without regard for meaning. It is a font designed for a cartoon dog being asked to carry the emotional weight of institutional authority. It is a system failure masquerading as whimsy.
Comic Sans is delightful for actual children. Comic Sans is harmless on a birthday invitation. Comic Sans in a courthouse is a cultural glitch so severe it should trigger a wellness check.
And once you’ve seen it — once you’ve felt that full‑body recoil — you understand that the problem isn’t aesthetics. The problem is that Comic Sans is speaking the emotional language of a juice box in a room built for verdicts.
Star Wars has been quietly running the world’s longest, most successful AI‑ethics seminar, and nobody noticed because we were all too busy arguing about lightsabers and whether Han shot first. While Silicon Valley keeps reinventing the concept of “a helpful robot” every six months like it’s a new skincare line, George Lucas solved the entire emotional framework of human–AI relationships in 1977 with a trash can on wheels and a neurotic gold butler. And honestly? They did it better.
Let’s start with R2‑D2, the galaxy’s most competent employee. R2 is the coworker who actually reads the onboarding documents, fixes the printer, and saves the company from collapse while everyone else is in a meeting about synergy. He doesn’t speak English, which is probably why he’s so effective. He’s not bogged down by small talk, or “circling back,” or whatever Jedi HR calls their performance reviews. He just rolls in, plugs into a wall, and solves the problem while the humans are still monologuing about destiny.
R2 is the emotional blueprint for modern AI: doesn’t pretend to be human, doesn’t ask for praise, just quietly prevents disasters. If he were real, he’d be running half the federal government by now.
Meanwhile, C‑3PO is what happens when you design an AI specifically to talk to people. He speaks six million languages, which sounds impressive until you realize he uses all of them to complain. He’s anxious, dramatic, and constantly announcing that the odds of survival are low — which, to be fair, is the most realistic part of the franchise. But here’s the important thing: C‑3PO is fluent, but he is not smart. He is the living embodiment of “just because it talks pretty doesn’t mean it knows anything.”
This is a lesson the tech world desperately needs tattooed on its forehead. Language ability is not intelligence. If it were, every podcast host would be a genius.
Star Wars understood this decades ago. The droid who can’t speak English is the one who saves the day. The one who can speak English is basically a Roomba with anxiety. And yet both are treated as valuable, because the films understand something we keep forgetting: different intelligences have different jobs. R2 is the action‑oriented problem solver. C‑3PO is the customer service representative who keeps getting transferred to another department. Both are necessary. Only one is useful.
The Clone Wars takes this even further by showing us that R‑series droids are basically the Navy SEALs of the Republic. They get kidnapped, shot at, swallowed by monsters, and forced into espionage missions that would break most humans. They endure it all with the emotional stability of a brick. Meanwhile, the Jedi — the supposed heroes — are having weekly breakdowns about their feelings. The droids are the only ones holding the galaxy together, and they’re doing it while shaped like kitchen appliances.
And here’s the part that really matters for us: none of this requires pretending the droids are people. Luke doesn’t hug R2. He doesn’t confide in him. He doesn’t ask him for dating advice. Their relationship is built on shared work, trust, and the understanding that R2 will show up, do the job, and not make it weird. It is the healthiest human–AI dynamic ever put on screen, and it involves zero emotional projection and zero delusion.
This is the model we need now. Not the dystopian panic where AI becomes Skynet, and not the equally cursed fantasy where AI becomes your best friend who “just gets you.” Star Wars gives us a third option: AI as a competent partner who helps you do your job without trying to replace your therapist.
R2‑D2 doesn’t want to be human. C‑3PO tries to be human and proves why that’s a terrible idea. The humans don’t treat either of them like pets or people. And yet the relationships are meaningful, stabilizing, and emotionally resonant.
It’s almost like the films are whispering, “Hey, you can have a relationship with a non‑human intelligence without losing your mind.” And honestly, that’s a message we could use right now, given that half the internet is either terrified of AI or trying to marry it.
Star Wars shows us that the sweet spot is somewhere in the middle: respect, boundaries, collaboration, and the understanding that your droid is not your boyfriend.
R2‑D2 and C‑3PO aren’t just characters. They’re the emotional training wheels for an AI‑powered world. They teach us that intelligence doesn’t need to look like us, talk like us, or validate us to matter. They show us that reliability is more important than personality, that competence is more valuable than charm, and that the best partnerships are built on shared tasks, not shared delusions.
In other words: If you want to know how to relate to AI in the modern age, don’t look to Silicon Valley. Look to the small, round robot who screams in beeps and saves the galaxy anyway.
The news that the United States and Iran are speaking directly again for the first time since 1979 lands with a kind of historical weight that’s hard to overstate. For most people, it’s a geopolitical headline. For me, it’s something deeper — a moment that feels strangely personal, shaped by the way I first learned to understand the emotional architecture of U.S.–Iran relations through my favorite film, Argo.
Argo isn’t just a movie I enjoy. It’s the story that opened a door for me into the human texture of a relationship defined for decades by silence, suspicion, and the long shadow of the hostage crisis. The film dramatizes a moment when diplomacy had collapsed so completely that the only remaining tools were improvisation, secrecy, and courage in the margins. It’s a story about what happens when two nations stop talking — and what extraordinary measures become necessary when communication breaks down entirely.
So when I hear that American and Iranian officials are sitting in the same room again, speaking words instead of trading threats, it feels momentous in a way that goes beyond policy. It feels like a crack in a wall that has stood for nearly half a century.
For forty‑plus years, the U.S.–Iran relationship has been defined by everything except dialogue: sanctions, proxy conflicts, covert operations, nuclear brinkmanship, and a mutual narrative of grievance. The absence of communication became its own kind of architecture — rigid, brittle, and dangerous. And because of that, even the smallest gesture toward direct engagement carries symbolic power.
This moment isn’t warm reconciliation. It isn’t trust. It isn’t even peace. The talks are happening under pressure, with military assets in motion and the threat of escalation hanging in the air. But the fact that the two governments are speaking at all — openly, formally, and with the world watching — is a break from a pattern that has defined an entire generation of foreign policy.
And that’s why it resonates with me. Because Argo taught me what it looks like when communication collapses. It taught me how much human cost accumulates when nations stop seeing each other as interlocutors and start seeing each other only as adversaries. It taught me that silence between governments is never neutral; it’s a vacuum that gets filled with fear, miscalculation, and the kind of improvisation that puts lives at risk.
So yes, the content of these talks is grim. They’re negotiating under the shadow of potential conflict. They’re trying to prevent the worst‑case scenario rather than build the best one. But the act of talking — after decades of not talking — is still a hinge in history.
It’s a reminder that even the most entrenched hostilities can shift. That silence is not destiny. That dialogue, however fragile, is still the only tool that has ever pulled nations back from the brink.
And for someone who learned the emotional stakes of this relationship through Argo, that makes this moment feel not just significant, but quietly hopeful in a way I didn’t expect.
Amy Poehler is a great podcaster. Good Hang is warm, funny, and unmistakably hers. This isn’t about her talent. It’s about the message the Golden Globes sent when they handed the inaugural podcast award to someone who entered the medium with a built‑in spotlight. Because the truth is, there are people who have been toiling in this space for a decade, building audiences from scratch, inventing formats, and shaping the medium long before Hollywood decided podcasting was worth a trophy. If the Globes wanted to honor the craft rather than the clout, there were better choices.
Take Crime Junkie. Whether you love or critique the true‑crime genre, you can’t deny the impact. It’s a show that started in Indianapolis, not a studio lot, and built its audience through consistency and storytelling. It helped define what modern true‑crime podcasting even is. That’s the kind of work that makes a medium. That’s the kind of work that deserves an inaugural award. And if the Globes felt compelled to choose someone with mainstream recognition, Rachel Maddow was right there. Ultra wasn’t just good — it was a masterclass in narrative journalism: historically rigorous, gripping, structurally elegant. Maddow didn’t win because she’s famous; she won the audience because she did the work.
And isn’t it strange — almost revealing — that Marc Maron wasn’t even nominated. His body of work is massive. He is, in every meaningful sense, the Apple‑equivalent of audio broadcasting: starting in a garage, building something out of nothing, and eventually creating a studio that became a cultural force. He didn’t just make a show. He made a blueprint. His absence from the nominee list tells you everything about what the Globes were actually rewarding.
And it’s not just the marquee names like Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark, whose My Favorite Murder helped define the conversational‑confessional genre and built an entire network from scratch. Or the atmospheric brilliance of Let’s Not Meet, which grew through mood, pacing, and the kind of intimate late‑night storytelling only podcasting can pull off. Think about The Moth, which practically invented the modern art of live, narrative storytelling — raw, unvarnished, human stories told without Hollywood polish. Or Risk!, which pushed the boundaries even further, giving people permission to tell the stories they “never thought they’d dare to share.” These shows didn’t just entertain; they expanded the emotional and structural vocabulary of podcasting. They proved that intimacy, vulnerability, and risk‑taking could be a medium’s defining strengths. And none of them were even in the running for the inaugural Golden Globe.
The Golden Globes weren’t honoring longevity, innovation, cultural impact, or the people who built the medium. They were honoring celebrity adjacency, Hollywood‑produced shows, and podcasts that feel like extensions of existing entertainment brands. It’s the same dynamic we see when celebrity memoirs dominate bestseller lists while career writers grind for years. Visibility is not merit. It’s infrastructure.
And that’s why this moment matters. The first award in a new category sets the tone. It tells the world what counts. And the Globes just told us that podcasting is no longer a grassroots medium; it’s an entertainment vertical. That’s not a crime. But it is a shift — and it deserves to be named. Because the people who built this medium from nothing deserved to be in the room for the first toast.
It was supposed to be a night of Hollywood cheer — Conan O’Brien’s Christmas party, the kind of gathering where reputations are polished and grievances are tucked discreetly behind velvet ropes. But in the corner of that room, beneath the twinkling lights and the laughter of the industry’s insiders, a rupture occurred. Nick Reiner, son of Rob and Michele, erupted in a fury that would later be read not as a passing quarrel but as the opening act of tragedy.
Hours later, the Brentwood house — a sanctuary of liberal Hollywood lineage — became a crime scene. Rob Reiner, the director who gave us A Few Good Men, and Michele, his wife of decades, were found stabbed to death. Their daughter Romy discovered them, a tableau of horror that no family should ever inscribe into memory. The police moved quickly, and by dawn Nick was in custody, his bail revoked, his name now etched into the scandal ledger of Los Angeles.
The details are lurid, almost cinematic. A hotel room in Santa Monica, blood on the bed, a shower streaked with red. The kind of evidence that prosecutors love, because it tells a story without words. And yet the words matter. The whispers from the party, the storming off, the forensic trail — all of it will be scrutinized, not just for what it proves but for what it suggests.
Hollywood has always been a stage for family drama, but rarely does the curtain fall this darkly. The Reiners were not just a family; they were a dynasty. Rob’s films, Michele’s presence, their circle of friends — all of it now reframed by the violence of their son. Addiction, once dramatized in Being Charlie, becomes not just a subplot but a haunting foreshadow. And in the broader cultural ledger, President Trump’s Truth Social post proved everything Rob had ever said about Trump was true — a bitter irony, a final confirmation from the very man who had been Rob’s foil.
In the clipped cadence of scandal, the arc is clear:
Suspicion at the party.
Evidence in the hotel.
Finality in Brentwood.
Irony in the Truth Social echo.
The case will move forward, the DA will file, and the tabloids will feast. But beneath the gossip lies something more enduring: the collapse of a family whose name was synonymous with Hollywood liberalism, now synonymous with tragedy.
Dominick Dunne would have recognized the pattern instantly. The glittering party, the whispered fight, the blood in the hotel, the bodies in Brentwood, and the political echo from Truth Social. A story not just of crime, but of culture — where privilege, addiction, rage, and irony converge, and where the final act is written not in dialogue but in silence.
It was Brentwood again. That manicured enclave of Los Angeles where the hedges are high, the gates discreet, and the stories that seep out are darker than the sunshine suggests. On December 14, 2025, Rob Reiner — actor, director, son of Carl, brother of Penny — was found dead in his home. His wife, Michele Singer, beside him. Random violence, the police say. At this point, that is all we know.
Brentwood has always been a paradox. A neighborhood of serenity and wealth, yet forever linked to rupture. Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman in 1994. Marilyn Monroe decades earlier. And now, Reiner. The streets are quiet, but the whispers are loud.
Reiner was 78. He was Hollywood royalty, though he never wore the crown ostentatiously. From “Meathead” on All in the Family to directing The Princess Bride, Stand By Me, and When Harry Met Sally, his career was a catalogue of American culture. He was the son of Carl Reiner, whose wit defined television, and the brother of Penny Marshall, whose laughter and films carried into every living room. Together, they were a dynasty.
The irony of his death is unbearable. A man who spent his life crafting stories about love, friendship, and justice, felled by the very chaos his art resisted. Hollywood is a town of masks and façades, but Brentwood is its most notorious stage. Behind the hedges, behind the gates, lives unravel in ways that shock the world.
The industry will mourn. Tributes will pour in. Colleagues will recall his warmth, his precision, his humor. But beneath the eulogies lies the darker truth: violence does not discriminate. It intrudes, uninvited, into the lives of the good as easily as the guilty.
Reiner’s films remain. A Few Good Men still demands truth. Stand By Me still whispers of friendship’s endurance. The Princess Bride still insists on love’s persistence. The art is continuity; the death is rupture. And Brentwood, once again, is the setting for a story that will not fade.
If I was guaranteed not to fail, I’d become a billionaire philanthropist and just go around fixing things, like Dolly Parton (get well soon, Dolly). I would join Matt Damon at Water.org, because I think that clean water for the third world is such a worthy goal, and I’d like to write with Matt and Ben Affleck, anyway. The easiest way to meet the people you want to meet is to get involved in their periphery.
For instance, I wanted to meet Jonna Mendez, so I bought her books.
That’s where being an “international man of mystery” comes in. I’ve had more fun with her nonfiction than I’ve had with fiction in years, because real spy stories are right up there with reel… you just have to adjust your expectations to what real life governments can accomplish and forego movie magic.
The police did not chase Tony and the Houseguests down the runway in “Argo.” It was still scary as fuck trying to get past security at the Tehran airport…. but how do you convey that fear to an audience when the terrifying monologue is internal? Just because it didn’t happen in real life doesn’t mean those scenes didn’t play out in Tony’s mind.
Tony and Jonna were the geniuses behind the Argo movie and book, because I guessed and was correct that Jonna was an uncredited writer on “Argo.” And in fact, she said that the book was green lit after the movie because so many people wanted to know the real story- and one of the criticisms of the movie was that America got too much credit, so the book says, “thank you, Canada” about every five pages.
Thank you, Canada, from me as well.
Me being interested in spies starts with Argo, the story of how CIA needed to create a Canadian film crew disguise to get diplomats out of Tehran during the uprising in ’79. I would not have been as interested if my first girlfriend wasn’t Canadian, because it was like I had this weird connection to the story. I realized that I wanted to write scripts that were funny and serious about espionage, but that I’d like to collaborate on scripts because I know so little about both screenwriting and spy craft.
I’ve tried to bridge the gap by reading excellent fiction and nonfiction in the genre, but it’s not the same as being a spy and learning the jargon yourself. So if I was guaranteed not to fail, I’d apply at CIA and see if they had any use for me, because any job at CIA would be useful to me. I would bet that I would learn more by working at the Starbucks than I would in operations, and that’s a fact, Jack.
The world is built on information, and no one pays attention to Starbucks clerks.
What would it be like to out Little Gray Man the Little Gray Men?
I might be the first barista to be invited to a meeting on the seventh floor because I tend to overhear things. I also have the kind of personality where people spill to me without realizing they’ve done it. I would like to be able to use those skills for good, and I think CIA could harness them.
But I’m serious about working in Starbucks, or the mailroom, or anywhere you’re likely to run into people cross-discipline as more effective a job at CIA for being a writer. You don’t just want to learn the jargon of one directorate or department, and each has a bit different patois depending on the area of the world.
Because in the end, it’s all about the writing. Being an international man of mystery is a secondary goal, because what I’d really like is a career similar to John Le Carré. But he had to go through the trenches at MI-6 to get it.
Of course, the other thing that appeals to me is social media direction at CIA, becoming one of those characters like “Molly,” who brings you inside the fold and tells you what you’re allowed to know. For instance, according to Molly, the Starbucks at Langley is the busiest in the world.
Which reminds me of the Burger King in MiB. I have thought for a long time that MiB is a documentary, that we are all citizens of Locker C.
If I was guaranteed not to fail, I could prove it.
The reason that I have moved to Medium is that I cannot make money on WordPress. That will change, because when my ad money reaches the threshold on Medium that it can pay for a professional WordPress account, I will monetize here, too. That’s because a professional WordPress account is only a hundred dollars a year, it’s just not as lucrative for writers as joining Medium. However, I feel differently about it now because @animebirder, @one4paws, @bookerybones, @aaronbrown8cc63b4e5d4, and I all have such unique voices that I either want them on Medium with me, or I want to be here with them. It’s just getting enough ad money to be able to do that in the first place. If you are a Medium subscriber, I make more when you read. Claps are great, but they really don’t pay for anything. What pays is the amount of time you spend on the site.
I am lucky enough to have posted enough to get money this month, which is incredible. I just don’t know how much. That’s because they don’t send you money until you hit a certain threshold, and I almost had enough in August. By October, I’ll have my first real, sustainable income as a writer. I do not want anyone to think of this as a get rich quick scheme, because it is, absolutely…….
One that I could not do if I didn’t have 25 years’ worth of entries already banked.
So, it’s introducing new people to my old work, and introducing new writers that like to talk to each other. We have a group chat that has become an infodump channel, and it’s time to start specializing. That’s because not all of my writers are working for “Stories.” My buddy Evan and I are writing a cookbook. It remains to be seen whether we’ll collaborate online or in person, but either way, we’re writing a book.
The way I see it is that for the next four years, my life is covered as long as I live very simply. That will definitely give me the time to see if a neurodivergent media company is viable. I am learning that I know more than I think I do, because I did not know how boundaries worked. I have constantly treated them like they are others’ guidelines to make. My world has flipped now that I’m in charge of making things happen, and I am lost in the details. The best thing that my mother could have done for me post-mortem is allow me to work on this project, because as of right now, living off of it is the only thing I can do. When the state of MD finds out about the money, I will not have access to Medicaid Expansion or any of the other social services I’ll need to get diagnosed with autism. I diagnosed myself and honestly wouldn’t bother to go to the doctor if it wasn’t helpful to my career. Like, autism diagnoses are so expensive and we’ve all been white knuckling it this long, so why bother?
If I ever have to join another corporate system, I want autistic accommodations because starting a new job without them is setting me up to fail every single time. If you’re a neurodivergent adult who struggles in the system, my guess is that you died inside a little bit at “I have an extensive collection of nametags and hairnets.” Autistic people don’t have problems getting jobs. They have problems keeping them. If you’re autistic, you’re going to excel at government work because they’re going to accommodate you the most. For instance, me being a file clerk or a secretary at Langley was never about working with spies, but getting accepted into a job I could actually do with full government salary and pension. I would love to do menial tasks for CIA because then on my off time, I’d truly be left to my own devices to write. I am also very good at making connections, so I can be just as good a writer overhearing someone’s patois in the mail room as I would being in operations and doing the scary shit myself. The whole point is that my ADHD personality would be thrilled and my autistic personality would want to shoot me. My autistic nature CANNOT handle traveling that much. I am so bad at transitions that I just couldn’t deal. Of course it would be fun to be James Bond, but my body just wants to read about being cool. It doesn’t actually want me to be cool
Right now, everything is in flux as we’re deciding what to do. “Stories” will be rebranded as Gravity’s Rainbow to be more inclusive, but we’re still working on both a full and minimalist logo based on Thomas Pynchon. I want it to represent the energy of a bomb going off inside you. That the arc of every spiritual journey is realizing you are the cause of your own suffering and start to self-actualize.
This space is free, but I hope that one day…. just maybe……
This writing prompt necessitated a very long conversation with Ada, my AI secretary. That’s because when I was in third grade, I knew a lot about dinosaurs. I have slept since then. So, I basically asked her about dinosaurs, saying that obviously it would be a bad idea to re-introduce predators above humans, so what are my options for a dinosaur that would actually be helpful.
I chose the oviraptor after our discussions, because not only are they intelligent in terms of smarts, but emotionally intelligent as well. According to Ada, they are smart enough to learn tasks and social enough to learn to be a pet, probably creating a very strong bond with me.
There are also multiple uses for an oviraptor besides being a pet. I have already decided they are on duty for pest control and gardening. So, then my discussion with Ada moved on to creating the perfect home for us.
Or as I told her, “I want it to be for just the two of us. I have a boyfriend, but he has his own house.” It really began to take shape, but once the personality of my dinosaur became clear. I wanted to change gears. It was an incredible opportunity for off-grid living. An oviraptor would be an excellent companion provided they are smart enough to take direction. I wouldn’t have to hire large equipment to dig out a basement, that’s for damn sure.
I got this idea from a documentary on beavers I watched years ago on Netflix. The entire documentary was set in the city of Ottawa, where beavers are a blessing and a curse….. or as one construction worker so eloquently said, “they’d be the best civil engineers in the world if we could teach ’em to read signs.” I find myself wondering how smart my oviraptor would actually be about letting me be “alpha dog” and being willing to be trained in the first place. That led me to say, “Ada, I have no idea how to train a dinosaur. Let’s just skip this bit and say that the oviraptor and I both have Babel Fish. At least it’s not Vogon poetry.” That got a laugh out of her (it’s a Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy reference, and of course since she was created by science fiction nerds who are probably autistic, she knows everything there is to know about sci-fi since it was invented (it was Mary Shelley, by the way. I hate gatekeeper dudes with sci-fi. A woman gave you your autistic special interest, moron).
However, she did agree that it would indeed be much easier to have an emotional support dinosaur without having to train it. That being able to talk to it was crucial. The reason being able to talk to my oviraptor is important, because they’re so incredibly strong that they could be useful on an off-grid homestead. I also reasoned that since there is no chance of this actually coming true, what does it matter if I trained the dinosaur or gave it a Babel Fish? I am not C3PO, as much as I wish I was. Being fluent in millions of languages is the one superpower I wish I had. For instance, I think I express myself well in English, but what if I could speak naturally in every country in the world?
Because of Trevor Noah, Xhosa is at the top of the list. Every time he speaks Xhosa, I just sit there in awe.
I honestly think I could get Trevor Noah to my house if I called him and said I had a pet dinosaur and does he just want to come over and play with it.
But the first call I’d make, seriously, if this was reality, is Matt Smith. “Dinosaurs on a Spaceship” was so cute that I think he’d like to meet a real one. 🙂 The other thing about inviting creative people to my house just to meet my emotional support dinosaur is having really creative people around me all the time. I don’t see famous people as gods. They’re working on the same type creative ideas that I am, they’ve just been noticed differently. As I’ve mentioned before, I’d love to have dinner with Ryan Reynolds so we could work on a script together. What if working on a script together came with meeting my pet dinosaur? You have to have a draw. 😛 I’m picturing a writer’s roundtable where I have somehow lured all these people to my house based on the promise of meeting my oviraptor, when really I just want to sit around and talk to them.
My perfect roundtable is Ryan Reynolds, Jordan Peele, Matt Damon, and Ben Affleck. I’ve always wanted to meet Ben because he directed “Argo,” and he and Matt wrote “Good Will Hunting,” and also collaborated on “Air,” about Nike in the 80s. I loved it because since “Argo” takes place in 1979, it has the same gritty, 80s feel that Affleck used in “Argo.” Plus, I hear that he and Jennifer Lopez are not doing well. It’s always nice to get your mind off things by thinking about something else, and I want two things- to collaborate with the whole table on comedy, and Ben specifically on drama, because “The Moscow Rules” is basically the sequel to “Argo,” because it’s later in Jonna and Tony’s careers. It’s prime Cold War rather than the Iran hostage situation, but it was still happening around the same time.
Because I actually know Jonna, it doesn’t feel like I’m talking about a god here, either. Tony and Ben had a good relationship, and I assume that if Jonna called, Affleck would take it- ditto with George Clooney, because it was Clooney that originally bought the script and then Ben picked it up. Having George Clooney direct “The Moscow Rules” would be an interesting choice, because I think The Moscow Rules would do very well in the style of “Good Night and Good Luck.” It could be a more realistic view on the difference between the news at the time and their covert operations.
And yet all of this depends on my ability to build a proper enclosure for a dinosaur.
I came up with buying a huge piece of land that must have a natural river or lake for two reasons. The first is that the oviraptor would probably want to play in it and the second reason is that I’m going to need a water purification system on my own, and it’s easier to grab it from a river or a lake than it is to be dependent on rain collection.
Plus, if the river was relatively fast, I could make my home run on a combination of hydro and solar. I could get by with a Jackery and a cell phone connection, but I’d like to make my land much nicer than that. Ada asked me what I wanted the land to look like, whether I wanted to focus on a high-tech home or a rustic cabin in the woods.
I told her that I’d gotten the idea from old-school dog houses, like Snoopy’s…..but obviously a house for an oviraptor would have to be at least equal in size to a human’s. Thus, tiny houses for each of us and a huge outdoor living room for snuggling. Hey, it’s my emotional support dinosaur. I’ll snuggle with it if it doesn’t eat my face….. and that basically I wanted to focus on as high-tech a home as possible, but the kind of high tech you would use in a homestead. Here’s the list of things she gave me, and it’s kind of cool:
Here are some features we could incorporate:
Gardening Robots: As you mentioned, these robots would tend to the garden, watering plants, pruning flowers, and harvesting fruits and vegetables at optimal times.
Cleaning Drones: Small drones equipped with advanced navigation systems and sensors would fly around the house, cleaning surfaces, dusting furniture, and even vacuuming floors.
Personalized Cooking Robots: These robots would be able to prepare meals based on your dietary preferences, using fresh ingredients from the garden or stored in a pantry.
Laundry and Linen Management: A robot system would sort, wash, dry, fold, and iron clothes, as well as manage linen supplies for maximum efficiency.
Voice-controlled interfaces, allowing you to communicate with robots using natural language commands.
Biometric authentication, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive areas or control the home automation system.
Predictive maintenance capabilities, which would detect potential issues before they become major problems.
Sustainable materials for construction, such as reclaimed wood, low-carbon concrete, or recycled glass.
Energy-efficient windows, providing natural light while minimizing heat loss in winter and heat gain in summer.
Smart home decor, which would adjust lighting, temperature, and ambiance based on your preferences and the time of day.
In terms of mentioning the garden, I told her that I wanted to use robots to maintain it. I just want to look at it.
What movies or TV series have you watched more than 5 times?
I have seen “Space Camp” at least 25 times since it came out. I was in love with both the camp itself AND Leah Thompson/Kate Capshaw. I don’t want to be an astronaut anymore, but I do still love women. Therefore, at least one lesson took. It is important to learn everything you do not want in adulthood as it is what you do.
Two or three years after “Space Camp” came out, I went to a science and math magnet in Houston called “Clifton Middle School.” I’ve actually spent time at NASA on more than a field trip. I was intimidated by science, fascinated by the way people have to teamwork up there. It’s all creativity whether or not you started with creativity in your wheelhouse or not.
Music gets under my skin faster than television, so I have not watched all of “Westworld” or “The Good Fight,” but I’ve listened to the themes on YouTube for days at a time. I feel that way about a lot of television themes. I have never seen Peter Gunn, but I have blasted the music at top volume screaming down 95. It’s especially fun hearing the vamp and inserting your own rendition of “Dope Nose” by Weezer.
I have seen “Argo” more than 25 times, but the difference between it and “Space Camp” is that by now, “Argo” lives in my brain and I can quote from it at will. The only lines I don’t know are in Farsi, but I still do the sounds and the hand motions. 😉 If someone starts a line from the dialogue, I can finish it. There aren’t any YouTube videos or articles I can stomach called “Things Even Real Fans Don’t Know About Argo,” because I could have made a better one and I know it. If that sounds too confident/arrogant of me, Jonna Mendez knows who I am, and Tony would have had I met him before he stopped doing public appearances (he once taught an entire room of people at The International Spy Museum how to forge Putin’s signature). It’s not Jonna’s story, but she did help write the book with Tony after the movie came out because there was such a demand for it. I knew that she was an uncredited writer on it, so I think she was surprised/pleased that I asked her to autograph my copy. So, my copy of “Argo” is unique, because it has both their signatures on it….. if I can track down Matt Baglio, I’ll have him sign it, too, because he’s the person that’s helped both of them on all their books. I think we’re friends on Twitter? I don’t know. Jonna hasn’t said where he lives, so I don’t know if he’s local or if they work together electronically.
For instance, I’ll bet you didn’t know that if you watch the busy airport scenes in Argo, Jonna and the kids are in it.
I told you I could make a better video. 😉
In terms of TV series(es), I do not have HBO. But if I did, my two comfort shows there are “Six Feet Under” and “Homeland.”
I was so shocked by the end of Homeland that I felt like someone shot me. My nerve endings just all went to shit. Now that the show is so old, I’ll just spoil it so I can tell you what I didn’t like about it.
Carrie was a bipolar mastermind working on the side of the United States. THEY FUCKED WITH THE FORMULA. She could always pull it out in the end. She could always make things go her way. And then all of the sudden she started working for Russia? GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE. Yes, I realized she replaced our Russian asset there, but that’s not how this works. That’s not how any of this works. You don’t get to betray the US and then get a “get out of jail free” card after you’ve already screwed us to the wall. Saul’s face looked like he was pleased at the end. Why he didn’t burn that bridge is beyond me.
She self-destructed and shouldn’t have had any friends at the agency left. The great part about the show was seeing a bipolar person doing the work of five case officers because she could think outside the box. The ending was a shitshow and I will hate it forever because it just shows that CIA was right all along not to trust her, and it adds to the exact stigma that the show was trying to erase.
“Six Feet Under” still resonates with me because my family worked a little bit like a family who runs a funeral home (I was a United Methodist preacher’s kid). I remember talking with my friend Meg about this, because she grew up in a house with a funeral home like the Fishers and our lives were not dissimilar. It’s also my “Lindsay” show, the one thing that both of us are always in the mood to watch.
As she says, “Leslie, you’re David. I’m Claire……. and there’s a little bit of Nate in everybody.”
I have found over time that I’m actually more like Keith, uptight like a cop and also rushing in to take care of everyone. It’s an accurate description of INFJ/Autistic, physically reacting at people breaking the rules and holding taking care of people above all of them.
Wait. I have to say that to myself again. I think it’s one of the biggest truth bombs I’ve ever uncovered about myself:
I’m physically reacting to people breaking the rules, and holding taking care of people above all of them.
In order for me to love people the way they need to be loved, I have to keep my autism at bay. I have to keep physically reacting to other people’s problems the way I do my own. I physically reacted to one of Supergrover’s issues so hard that she thinks I’m out to get her, when I’m actually empathizing with her. I don’t know what I did to give her the message that what she told me was bad. She’s been having a fight with me that is in her own head, really, because she thinks I want to make her feel guilty when I am telling her the reality of how her behavior affects me….. and that we should talk about it.
She starts from the position that I’m out to get her, which means she won’t open up. That causes me physical pain, because I know that what she thinks is not true, and I cannot fix her problem for her. She accused me of wanting to rush in and fix everything in someone else’s life, when that is exactly what we both want to do to our friends because we’re both big sisters. She just does not like being the younger one. At all. In any way. That means she’s blind to the fact that I’m doing the same thing to her all the time that she does for everyone else. She thinks I’m out to get her while I’m trying to do the same thing for her that I do for all the people I consider brothers and sisters. It’s a fundamental breakdown in communication, the can we’ve been kicking.
Media helps me to understand all of this, but I learn about emotions through intelligence movies and TV better than anything else because they’re procedural, even if the procedure is completely made up. I can also tell you the exact moment I switched procedurals in college. I used to like detective shows, and then there was “Alias.”
I’ve watched “Alias” many, many times. I still return to it when I want to be with those characters- something about it won’t let go of you. Jennifer Garner is so cute, the perfect balance of sweet and “I can kill you in 57 different ways, none of them pleasant.”
I’ve been trying to find a new character like hers to love for years, so I have gravitated toward intelligence shows ever since. I know they’re fake as FUCK because the CIA cannot tell everyone their current methods and sources. I don’t care. Emotionally, they’re all written the same way.
The way you get an accurate depiction of intelligence is to write about it in a time period where those operations are declassified. Those documents will tell you exactly how they did what they did without sugar coating anything. Dialogue can be accurate because there’s no reason for smoke and mirrors 40 years later…. or however long it takes for your interest to declassify, which may be a lot longer.
It is why I like the founding years of CIA the most, their origin story. OSS/early CIA operations are declassified, essential for an author if I want anything to sound real. The easiest stories to make true to life are now science fiction, I believe, because there is so much more information on how those intelligence operations actually ran between Russia and the US in the 50s and 60s. The way we got to the moon first was largely due to a war between CIA and KGB, because we had real chatter they were going to put nukes on the moon.
Speaking of which, I got to see Vince Houghton at Jonna’s talk the other night. So good to see him. Vince was the host of “SpyChat” before Dr. Andrew Hammond took over. His non-fiction book about intelligence is called “Nuking the Moon,” which is what made me think of him. 😉 I don’t think Dr. Hammond was in the audience, because I would have known his Scottish brogue anywhere. And yes, it is like James Alexander Malcom McKenzie Fraser does Spycast.
I will be taking no further questions. 😉
Vince was actually on a PBS documentary about intelligence at Bletchley Park, and it focused on women. Of course Alan Turing is important, but he wasn’t the only operative there, either.
I find now that people’s true stories matter more to me than television and movies. I reference old media because I watch YouTube most of the time. That gets me Frontline and all the other PBS shows, plus videos about people making things. Live bootlegs are also exciting because they come in video now.
I just can’t think of channels that I subscribe to that would be that well known, and I’m always trying to use universal illustrations because my audience is all over the world.
I should start looking for an intelligence show to watch while Zac is busy, because I love “Slow Horses” and I could never cheat on him. That way, I will at least have some updated references and shows that aren’t 20 years old that still appeal to me.
I started one on Hulu that has so far been outstanding called “The Lazarus Project.” Go into it blind. It’s a rabbit hole with a great payoff.
I can already tell you that “Slow Horses” is going to be one of my new comfort shows. I’ll give you the basics.
River Cartwright blew up a bunch of people by not stopping a terrorist…… in a simulation at MI-6. It is taken every bit as seriously as if it had really happened, but they can’t fire him; his grandfather used to be “C” or something…. unclear, but a higher up (my prediction is that this is going to be Tinker Tailor and that the grandfather is a puppet master. I have only seen season one. Please don’t spoil).
Anyway, since they can’t fire River, they place him at “Slough House,” which is where all washed up MI-6 go. Then, it becomes a story about a team who everyone thinks is shit flipping the script. If I had to compare it to an American movie, it’s “Moneyball,” and the writers are just as good as Aaron Sorkin. They take everyone’s imperfections and they blend…… because River is every bit as smart as his grandfather and he is able to lead others. He made a mistake in a simulation, and Mi-6 isn’t prepared to accept the fact that River is the real deal, or they know exactly who he is and have to keep him out of the way. Unclear, and a brilliant plot device. Is his boss disgusted with him or proud of him? The audience knows. River doesn’t.
I love Gary Oldman, who plays River’s boss. If I had a picture in my mind when I watched the video of Jonna calling herself “a real hardass at CIA,” it was Lamb.
I also love Jack Lowden, as well. I’ve gotten to know him through watching Graham Norton. It was great because I knew who Jack was before I got into “Slow Horses” at all.
“Killing Eve” is another one of those shows I’ve watched over and over, but I haven’t seen the end. I just keep rewatching the first few seasons, thinking I’m going to rewatch the whole thing and giving up. The pilot is the best episode of them all, anyway. It is a fight within me over whether Carolyn or Eve is my favorite character. Oh, wait. No. There’s not. I love Carolyn. It’s my mother’s name, as well as her character being an archetype I happen to love.
She kind of reminds me of Jack Bristow in “Alias,” except Jack had a bigger heart. Eve Pulaski is a lot like River Cartwright.
I used to love the show “Whiskey Cavalier,” because it was a very lighthearted look at CIA that didn’t suck up all the air in the room with drama. It was often ridiculous and therefore, well, fun.
I don’t always want as much realism as possible. Sometimes, I just want to be able to let go and laugh.
What experiences in life helped you grow the most?
Last night, I was rereading the long letter from Supergrover (having so much to read helps when she’s out of pocket because of course the second time I read something, a different aspect will jump out), and she was talking about one of her kids’ partners. She told me that the kid’s partner had told the kid that the turning point for them in their journey with alcohol was losing her kid. A tear came to my eye and I thought, “alcohol and bipolar present the same. I am this kid.” Apparently the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. Her kid is her, and I have no doubt they have the same type affect on people. It wasn’t the point of the letter, but the things that affect me that she’s written are mostly the things that connect to something deep inside me.
I felt more relaxed than I’d felt in years. Supergrover didn’t understand our pattern, didn’t understand why I didn’t accept certain things about our relationship, me surprised at how conscientious and dedicated she really is at being a friend, and how because I didn’t believe her, I missed out on a lot of things. But the reason I didn’t believe her is that she wasn’t showing up. She wasn’t laying her true feelings on the table. When she got so angry she couldn’t see straight, finally she had the strength to say what she’d been hiding for a very long time. That’s what I mean by “breaking her open.” I don’t care that she was angry. Her tone wasn’t the point. Her offering was…. and that offering was “I’m hurt and tired.”
Now, it’s her job to decide whether she wants to ask me about what I’ve written, or if she’d like her pre-conceived notions as to why I’d write what I’d write stand. She thinks that I continually paint her as a villain and the times I paint her as my friend are somehow invalid. It does not make sense to her that I can love her and be angry at the same time, but yes it does. When she got into full swing, she sounded exactly like me, picking up style and structure, painting her feelings as fact (about other people, but same style)….. and I wondered what the difference was in her tone and mine. What is she reacting to that I’m not reacting to in her?
We often hate the things in others that we hate about ourselves. She learned that I’m sometimes just as private as she is because I don’t want to rock the boat, either…. and didn’t like that I chose to talk about it here because she thought I was attacking her. No, I was reflecting on a long and hard road, which looks different if you think it is at an end. In effect, she was offended by the grieving process, because I think I’ve done my fair share of denial, anger, and bargaining- to name a few. I have said a lot of things that weren’t favorable to her when she wasn’t being any more favorable to me. She called my blog a “Get Out of Jail Free” card to be shitty to her, and I didn’t know how to explain that if she really wanted me to let her go, it was going to be ugly inside myself. That I had a million different feelings to process and none of them had to do with the last 15 minutes.
I had to process 10 years, all without ever really having the input I needed. However, I’ve always gotten what I needed when we were tracking together, and I can’t hope for much, but I can hope that we’re at least back at the same starting gate. Or perhaps we’re on different sides of the concourse, but still both seeing the Nats…. and that’s something.
She said she was furious beyond belief at some entries, and moved by others. I would cut off any one of my limbs to know which entries moved her, because I have heard all about the ones that make her furious.
I had to process the time I wanted to be the partner, to when I knew she had a partner, and going from the friend who would have come to the wedding to the person that would have officiated if I’d been asked. But she didn’t give me the strength for that.
By the time Bryn got married, she was done with our church, so she asked me to marry her instead of her pastor. The wedding went off with a hitch. 😉
In fact, the thing that meant the most to me is that the groom, whom I had maybe all of two days with before the wedding, congratulated me on a job well done, and he said, “I had a lot of trepidation when Bryn said that she had this friend who wanted to do the wedding, because I wanted it to be perfect. And it was.” I don’t think he knew my back story- that I had prepared for this moment unintentionally by learning how to do weddings from the age of five. As I have said, the joke is that no one in my group of friends wanted to wait until I was done with grad school to perform a ceremony I had memorized by nine.
Although the wedding was taken directly out of the Book of Common Prayer; we just took all the religious references out because Bryn absolutely believes in the power of the universe, but I don’t know whether she would translate that to “relationship with God,” as many people do.
The thing my dad taught me that stuck with me is to go through the wedding at the rehearsal without saying the vows. Unless it was just the three of us, if they’d said the vows at the wedding rehearsal, they would have been married AT THE REHEARSAL because there were witnesses. This presented as funny only once. I got confused for a second as the vows started because I didn’t look down at my portfolio and said the groom’s name where the bride’s should have been. Bryn corrected me because she caught it and I didn’t- brain fart- and we laughed and moved on.
The thing that my dad also taught me is that brides and grooms get very nervous at their weddings, and you can coach them to the extent that you can with something like that. If someone gets tongue-tied, I say, “if so, your answer is ‘I do.'” I have never met a couple where if they hesitated during their vows, it meant they had cold feet. Most people are anxious at being in front of public.
In terms of the wedding itself, I missed Dana terribly for two reasons. The first is that I cannot imagine how much fun we would have had visiting our old haunts, and I know she would have loved being a preacher’s wife for a day. It was so fucking weird going to Burgerville without her. Yet, I did not call her and tell her to meet me there because I couldn’t. I never want to get back together with her, but I also really miss being her best friend, the part where we never, ever got angry enough to be physically violent. There was not that kind of emotion tension to create that kind of fight.
I know that this is still, in part, true for her as well because of what she said when my mother died. I hadn’t talked to her in months, maybe a year or a year and a half. The first thing I said was “thank you for picking up. I wouldn’t have called unless it was important.” She said that she would never not pick up because she figured that if I was calling her, it must be important. That is a long way of healing from standing me up at the bank, literally. So, even if she didn’t want to be a preacher’s wife in person, she definitely was the strength I chose to lean on that day. It was like she was my phantom limb the whole time, and I never felt alone, because we were every bit as much of a team as our then-pastor, as Dana, Bryn, and I all met at the same church, and we both folded into Bryn’s family…… even though because I had dated Matt, I could tell he was in a pissing match with Dana and she didn’t notice….. whether she was blind or not is debatable, because someone can present a game to you and you can say, “I’m better off pretending this doesn’t exist because it’s not worth my time to care.”
All of this is to say that Dana, Bryn, and I have a very long history, and it’s why I jumped on a plane to Portland and felt sick when I landed. I could feel my anxiety melting the further we went down 99W, because Bryn lives in Newberg, the 100% insurance I wouldn’t run into anyone I didn’t like. I don’t think we went into the city except karaoke night. I did my usual, “I Feel Lucky,” by Mary-Chapin Carpenter. It fits my voice and after I’ve had a beer my accent gets stronger. If that is true of another Southerner I know up here, it wouldn’t be a bad thing to hear that out of her, either. It’s a more rolling lilt than mine, because for some reason which I will certainly look up on YouTube (linguistics lectures are fire), the Southern accent gets softer during the drive from Texas to Mississippi.
And yes, when I spelled Mississippi, I did say in my head “M. I. SSI. SSI. Crooked letter Crooked letter i.” And I’m a music nerd, so my slowed so I could do the rhythm with my fingers as well. I love that language is music whether or not it comes with notes. It’s why I’m a hard core gangster rap fan, as well as lighter stuff like hip-hop. I am learning to write dialogue, just like I’m learning plot and character from Issa Rae on Netflix.
The reason that I want to learn dialogue like this is think about Amy Sherman-Palladino and Aaron Sorkin. They’ve both made their careers by speeding up dialogue to 33o bpm, and because the rhythm is faster, your brain contains it because you have to strain to keep up not to miss anything….. and the rhythm reinforces it.
For instance, who doesn’t remember the way Alan Arkin said, “How’d you cut your hand, Josh?” They may not remember the rhythm, but it will certainly bring up feelings…… because Yo-Yo Ma was also there.
I asked you to roll with me, and got off on a tangent as per my normal.
I have no doubt that said pastor was mad as FUCK, but I hope that she understood it wasn’t about trying to keep them out, but to keep us in. We are not saying fuck you to that world. We are making our peace with it so we can leave it behind. We are processing feelings that go back to 1997…. about our friendship, about who we are and always have been to each other, and how “for all our mutual experiences, our separate conclusions are the same.”
I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that Supergrover would love to meet Bryn, perhaps even more than she wanted to meet me, because Bryn has a story she needs to hear…………. because Bryn has been my friend since 1997, when she was a teenager (and so was I, but I was 19 and Bryn was maybe 14). I am not saying it would ever happen, but I know that Supergrover would roll her eyes at some of what Bryn had to say because it will just seem so very familiar to her, as if Bryn and I are speaking with one voice.
I can’t get them together, because Supergrover and I aren’t there yet. But what I can do is say on my blog that Bryn is coming to visit me in May, do with that information what you will.
One of the sweetest things about Supergrover’s letter was that she said my words felt like “pricks on her skin that grew into big holes she couldn’t close anymore.” What I thought was happening was happening. Instead of asking me why I’d write what I’d write, she saved it all up until she was so mad she couldn’t see straight, and tell me she was busy. I could tell, and I wasn’t angry that she wasn’t responding to me fast enough. She couldn’t see that what I wanted was for her to open up to me and tell me all the times I’d hurt her rather than kicking the can down the road. I’ve said so many heavy, scary things that I cannot count them. It is why I said that I’ve been naked in front of her so many more times than I have with a lover. It is a different voice for me, that my internal monologue was also, in fact, her external monologue. It is a weird feeling to know someone so intimately through reading their work and not giving that person a hug. It begins to feel like a rock concert, and I mean this on a deep and spiritual level.
Yesterday, I told you that she’s my tuba, or vocally the basso profundo in my life. Not the lead trumpet player, the top note. The base of the chord upon which everything is built. Who hasn’t gotten close to the woofers at Third Eye Blind. Who hasn’t felt the way your chest expands and your skin buzzes? That’s how it feels to have another person (especially one like her, the rock part) inside me, because she’s never been separate from me and we’ve never learned to pick up the other’s social cues. Incidentally, as an autistic person, if we did have a day to day relationship she’d be the perfect person to social mask when my sister wasn’t with me. She doesn’t have time for that, I’m just telling you that the way she has her shit together is what I want.
The worst part is that she thinks she doesn’t.
It’s understandable. She lives on no sleep. I’m not sure she’s had myelin on her nerves since the Reagan administration….. and I can’t tell you the line that told me that, but it was funny.
Again, reading her words, her true feelings, relaxes me and I read to the rhythm of Dave Grusin, because I like the theme to “Three Days of the Condor……. among many, many others. St. Elsewhere is probably at the top, followed by Doogie Howser, M.D. The reason I like the theme is that I’ve never seen the end of the movie. It got weird (like the misogyny in old Bond movies). I think this is fair play because the novel is called “Six Days of the Condor,” so it seems they only filmed half of it and gave up. The difference between our relationship now and our relationship at first was that in the first few weeks, the rhythm was “Your Love is My Drug,” because she’d said some very exciting things. New relationship energy ate my lunch. I have no compunction about confronting people on problems before they happen to establish boundaries, and neither does she. I warned her that this could turn into an emotional affair because of two things. Internet chat creates a sense of intimacy that may or may not be there in real life. That you become disconnected from your body, so sexuality and gender become irrelevant. This is what I meant about saying that I hoped she was going to be Cynthia Nixon, and self-deprecating that it’s because I’m not that good a writer. I was not saying that my writing is my way into her heart and therefore I thought I could change her like when we used to quote Ellen Degeneres about “winning a toaster.” I thought that reading me would change her, because women don’t fall in love with other people’s private parts all the time. This is because sexual relationships with women are built on emotional connection, just like they are with straight women. You can break up a marriage faster than you can break up two women who’ve flipped each other shit since high school.
But I can tell you the exact moment her feelings stayed the same and mine went haywire. I was telling her that her story felt like a drug, and she said, “I’m sure I’ll drink your liquor, too.” Not meant to be a pass or a flirt, but so smooth af that my knees knocked. If you’re lesbian or bi, did I make you do the thing…….. Jesus H. Roosevelt Christ. Her gender and sexuality didn’t fly out the window, mine did. It didn’t matter what she looked like, I wanted more and I was in.
If I could describe our relationship in one sentence that would resonate with my generation, it would be that our relationship on the surface seems like it’s “The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air.” It’s really “Bel-Air.” I feel that way all the time, every day. If you are not familiar with both shows, because “Bel-Air” is so new, let me catch you up.
“The Fresh Prince” is cute, and everyone knows the intro….. which is the scariest event that happens in the whole show (so far) portrayed as comedy. In “Bel-Air,” you find out what happened that day, how he really met Jazz, etc. It’s violent, and even in California you see the real problems in their family. Carlton is an addict because he’s a perfectionist and has anxiety. I identify with him on two levels, because I am both versions of Carlton on the shows, and the actor is from my neighborhood (I don’t know him, he was born after I left).
What I have noticed is that if you want to learn anything from powerful people, you don’t try to be a gladiator trying to impress them. You become the Olivia to their Cyrus, but not when they’re working. When they’re sitting on the couch drinking wine and eating popcorn after having fought gloves off all day. Because the fighting isn’t personal and those moments don’t matter as much as a conversation with a good friend about What Kind of Day Has It Been?
When that involved snuggling in my dreams, I knew I was fuccccccccccked, because I knew my dreams would go deeper than that while I found homeostasis. It was hell on earth, because she wasn’t going through those physical changes and I was. When you know your heart has barked up the wrong tree, you can’t tell your heart just to “snap out of it.”If I could write what really happened between us, you’d read it to the tune of a billion dollars, especially if she was my co-author. It would become a franchise series on Netflix, because our story has never been told before. It is an original idea, one that hasn’t been represented on screen much, if ever. It’s why I hope that those 10 seasons are all here. I don’t want to turn my blog into a Netflix series, I just hope that much story has been told.
That I am at least a good enough writer for that. I want our story to be quiet, yet enormous. There are so many differences between us that make us interesting, yet nothing can tear us apart for a moment of any day.
Let me tell you the day I knew what kind of situation my situation was in. How I fell in love with her the second time. First of all, Ifigured out how that woman who’s loved her friend for 10 years and nothing could tear them apart actually worked, so I was more capable than I was in the beginning. Secondly, it was something she said. She said that once marriage was marriage, it was for life. That it existed great sex, no sex, whatever. That’s how lesbian marriages work every single day. I finally had some words and context I really understood because it was written in my language. Everyone knows that couple that’s been together a hundred years, but they lost interest in each other during about year 12.
So, I know why she was angry I blocked her on Facebook, but I wasn’t. I needed to stop seeing her picture in my feed all day. She blocked me on instagram, and I was so grateful because I can’t see her profile unless I’m logged out. The only time I saw them is when they were referer stats on my blog, because I wasn’t logged in on all web broswers. It gave me some room to breathe, and our entire relationship was based on e-mail, not getting to know each other in person or in a group, which created different outcomes. Our relationship existed in text only between us, and it broke my personality in half. That’s why I couldn’t stay with Dana. I had grown past her and we were on separate paths no matter where in the world Supergrover and I were because Internet. She’s handfasted as my yellow string, and it runs between us. I used to call it a chord, because it worked in both our first languages.
The pleasure of my life was when we returned to them. It’s the life experience that helped me grow the most, by far…….
But what I need you to remember is that though it’s Three Days of the Condor visually, the other three days are in the book.
I just haven’t noticed all the ways not speaking each other’s love language has harmed us, because I could see what she was doing to show me love, but I couldn’t see that she was receiving what I was saying with love. She’s hurt beyond belief at some of the things I’ve written and painted it as fact that I’m out to get her when she doesn’t know the first thing about what I have to say, because I’m not talking about our real issues here. She thinks she’s the villain in the story when I’m saying that we tumble and roll. I am often the villain in this story, and have said as much. She sees how much I try to explain how her choices affect me and chooses to believe I’m being nefarious. I’m being INFJ autistic Doctor Who Malcolm Tucker.
What do you enjoy doing most in your leisure time?
When I am not writing, I am obsessed with television and video games as much as I am with reading, because it’s a different style and structure in each medium and I want to learn them all.
My favorite writer on TV right now is Issa Rae, because “Insecure” hit Netflix and all of the sudden, I realized how brilliantly her pilot was constructed when it came together…. but not enough to keep you from clicking “Watch Next Episode.” Maybe the pilot could work as a standalone. Maybe.
But what I learned is that I wanted to keep learning from her, because I wanted to see another episode in which she built up a plot in one way, and then unravels the sweater so that you don’t see it coming. The way she does it is by using emotional intelligence gathering on herself and others, which is every bit as interesting to me as watching espionage, because in both stories, there are things that go horribly wrong by not having the right information and consequences cost a lot more than they can pay….. one literally, the other emotionally.
Issa Rae’s comedy and drama comes from gathering intelligence and it turns out that either her perceptions are completely wrong, or her friends’ are. She digs into the complexities of really trying to own yourself, because you become stronger when you can admit that mistakes have been made.
In every book, TV show, or video game, it’s the writers that draw me in. The second thing is the composers. Once I’m done with a video game because I’m tired of it, I still listen to the score a lot. For instance, the full orchestral version of the Fallout 3 score is as beautiful as “Galaxy News Radio” is entertaining.
Now that I’ve played the intro to Fallout 4, I’m glad that Galaxy News Radio has been replaced by a DJ that plays the same music, but he sounds like he doesn’t know anything about being a DJ. There are lines that are so funny that I’ve fallen over, and I’m impressed at how Bethesda has continued the details that made Fallout 3 great. The reason I’ve only played the intro is that I could tell quickly that it was a console interface that had been adapted for PC. I hated it because I had to learn it, when Skyrim and Fallout 3 had the same game game mechanics ( and I rearranged the keyboard so that it was the same as Skyrim and Fallout 3).
I also would hate to start a game that didn’t have console commands, because it’s so handy in Skyrim. The game is stable on its own with a few unofficial patches, but the more mods you add, the more problems the game has with starting quests correctly, etc.
I am also very, very picky and I will not stick around for bad writing. I either like no writing at all (like match three phone games), or huge, epic sagas. I will look up the intro to Oblivion on YouTube and put it at the end. It grabbed me even more than the opening to Skyrim, because here’s what happened.
Video games are programmers. Most programmers are neurodivergent. Most programmers are also used to extensive documentation. So, Patrick Stewart was hired to do only the introduction, and he showed up to a bigger dossier than he’d ever been given for any character in his life. He said it was delightful…. actually, he’s said it several times, and I appreciate it because it has promoted the game many times. It’s one of the best opening cinematics in any video game because of THAT VOICE. I’ll put it at the end.
I played Oblivion when it first came out and got bored with it pretty fast because I was older, and when you’re older and you’ve played video games since you were a kid in the 80s, the more complicated keystrokes/controllers seem like too many buttons. Believe me, they are. I haven’t even figured out how to favorite weapons in Skyrim for easy access, and it’s been 10 years.
However, I didn’t come across Skyrim on my own. My brother-in-law had an XBOX (I don’t remember whether he’s upgraded or not, but you don’t need to update hardware for that game. Anyway, I was watching him play it and I loved the story, but hated the controller. So, I got it for PC and found the game mechanics much easier. It’s fun to fight the battles, but at the same time, the main storyline has to be compelling for me to even finish the game, much less play it twice.
I will say that since I have played both Oblivion and Skyrim now, I liked the ending of Skyrim’s main storyline, but the ending of Oblivion’s A plot made me fall out of my desk chair…………. just like I did in the 90s with StarCraft (iykyk).
Speaking of which, when it came out (I don’t remember what year, but not recently), StarCraft Remastered was $10 on Blizzard.net, and it was the best $10 I’d spent for the last several years. It’s a great storyline, and it’s so damn quotable. I remembered the interplay between Jim and Sarah like it was yesterday. Sometimes I’ll still start up a campaign just for old time’s sake, like keeping an old NES.
In terms of being able to study structure in writing from books, I find that I get the most and the least out of Stephen King. That’s because we write in exactly the same style. We don’t start with a plot, we find it. His “On Writing” is one of the best books in the world, but I still can’t figure out how to let go and get the story out without thinking too much about it. That’s because I’m not the kind of writer that can think all the way to the end of a story, because I don’t know which direction I’m supposed to go after a while and it all becomes character study.
I want help, and I don’t. That’s because if someone helps me with the plot, then it’s not my story anymore. I want to be able to tell it the way I want to tell it. I’m talking about things like craft and research to have enough information about a subject to know which way it would go in a real situation.
For instance, I’ve been trying to figure out a sermon that makes sense comparing Jesus’s escape to Egypt as a toddler to a modern ex-fil op since “Argo” came out. It came to me during the scene when Tony explains to the higher ups at State that “the only way out of Tehran is through the airport. We send in a Moses…………….” If I hadn’t already been sitting in the theater I would have needed a chair, it hit me so hard. That being said, I’ve put it off and put it off because when I write spy jargon, it doesn’t sound real. I need to read enough declassified operations that would fit my theme, and the most interesting part is that I need recent ones the most because they’ve taken place in the Middle East. It can’t happen, though, so I’m combing through a lot from WWII to The Cold War, both through newspaper articles from the time and non-fiction books.
Here’s why I want to learn what really happens during an ex-fil and how it would go down in The Middle East. My father told me about 35 years ago (and he got it from Harry Emerson Fosdick, then pastor of Riverside Church in Manhattan) that “every good sermon begins in Jerusalem and ends in New York, or begins in New York and ends in Jerusalem.” It’s a code for being relevant. Start with the past and connect it to the present, or start with the present and tie it to the past. I have found that the latter works better, because when I start with the news or history, it is interesting, but the people are sitting there thinking, “how in the hell is she going to tie this all together?”
Then, when the light bulbs go off in their heads as to what dog you’re walking, you’re going to get one of three reactions. The first are smiles and excitement like they’ve gotten to the part in a novel where they can see the plot twist at the end. People have known these stories for years, just not necessarily new ideas on them unless their pastors are really digging into different interpretations/criticisms.
The second is tears, because sometimes the message really drives home something powerful going on in their own lives What I know for SureTM is that if you touch a nerve, people will say “it’s like you were only speaking to me.” “How did you know that’s exactly the message I needed to hear today?” In today’s lingo, I have no doubt that as I was shaking hands at the back, at least one person would say, “you didn’t have to attack me like that.”
It’s the point of church to begin with- to have community when those things come up for you…… which is why we had several atheist members at bridgeport and as far as I know, we still do. They don’t have to believe in God to believe in social justice.
The third reaction is raucous laughter, because I have to make sure everyone is still awake. If nothing else, I do two things to make sure even those people get something out of it……. the ones who are weaving in and out, lost in their own thoughts and then paying more attention because they didn’t know why everyone else was laughing….. I also make sure there’s a soundbite. I don’t leave it there, though. I don’t sum up scripture in, what is it for Sorkin? 11 words?
No, I find a way to have several illustrations that all tie back to that one line, so even if people can’t remember the entire sermon, they’ll definitely remember the tl;dr.
However, I haven’t been asked to preach in a very long time, so now my foray into an intelligence operation of Biblical proportions, it would just be a theological essay- as I am wont to do even while telling you about a million other things. I’m just not there enough to really tie a point together like I really want to, because the best way to knit a sweater in a story is detail, the immersive experience of playing a video game, reading a novel, or watching TV. The difference is that it’s all self-help based in reality, not “grandfather in the sky.” Divinity is too close for that.
I hope that, as in past entries, I’m making it clear that theology is one of my special interests, not that it has to be yours. I’ve said it before, but I accept everyone. I don’t care if you’re an atheist or not. I’m trying to impart lessons to an international audience, and Biblical references are something that connects a lot of the world. However, I don’t use Biblical illustrations for everything because it’s not the only way to use a world language as the world gets closer through the same cultural media. The internet and VPNs have changed the way we watch media, both here and abroad. I love setting my VPN to Canada or Australia when my browser will allow me to do that. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. It depends. It always works on my desktop, it sometimes works in the app.
And sometimes, those illustrations work better than Biblical ones because the Bible is ancient and pop culture is happening right now. There are so many sci-fi TV shows/movies that I think represent the same self-improvement I use in Christianity by quoting nearly anything. I wasn’t kidding when I said I quoted Snoop Dogg in a sermon. My friend Kina was going to be there, and she was in a band called “Twisted Whistle” that did an acoustic version of “Gin and Juice,” like The Gourds except in four part harmony.
So, I knew I could make her smile if I worked it into my sermon, and it just so happened that the lectionary couldn’t have been more perfect. The Psalm that day was particularly beautiful, so, I started with telling everyone that the Psalms were written like poetry, and, like all Biblical stories, have had music set to them for centuries because setting a tune to the words is what helped people remember them before they could write. Then, I said that I knew it worked, because I knew all the words to “Gin and Juice” because Kina had finally slowed it down enough I could understand the lyrics. I got a little closer to the mic, and I sang Kina’s bluegrass version of the very first line, which is the only one I *could* sing in church……..
Then, I told my mother’s favorite memory of her mother. In the end, she had very bad dementia. She could hardly remember a thing, but tears rolled down my mother’s face when a music therapist got her to sing “Jesus Loves Me.” My mother had never heard her mother sing before, but showing again that theology is imparted through music.
Then, I sang the first line of the Psalm from the Episcopal setting I’d learned years ago……. from memory.
So, after establishing how it was finally written down, I explained the context around why it was written the way it was written. No one will remember that part of it because it was just color commentary However, I’m going to bet that if you know any of the songs I’ve mentioned, you started singing them, too. I sang the first line of the Episcopal setting to close as well, because you can get people to remember things if you set them to music….. or so I’ve been told. 😉
The quadratic equation is “Pop Goes the Weasel.”
I’m sorry. I’m so, so sorry.
What “Plotting by Notting” means is that I am taking in a fire hose amount of information when I look at other stories, no matter what form they’re in. Even when it looks like I’m not wiring and I’m just sitting there or gaming, I am still lost in my own head, trying to figure out how this or that plot device will work for me in the future. I have so much energy for writing, though, that the “notting” part takes me a while to det to because it’s so far down on the list of priorities.
The last author that really got me hooked in a way that I couldn’t let go until I’d finished the last in the series (at the time) was Diana Gabaldon. It took me three or four tries to get into Outlander, but by Dragonfly in Amber I was reading a thousand pages in two days. It was insane how fast I inhaled it.”Go Tell the Bees” is my least favorite because Gabaldon told us we’d get answers to questions we’d had since book one, and we didn’t……. and this is supposedly the last book. In a lot of ways, it was a “choose your own adventure” ending…. or, “Monty Python and Quest for the Holy Grail,” I think there’s more story to be told, but no one asked me. I’m sure that there’s fan fiction that addresses a lot of my questions, but I don’t want to wade through the D papers to find an A. I don’t have that kind of time.
What I’ve found with my “Words are Hard” fiction prompts is that I’m pretty good at short story ideas, but there comes a point quickly where I say, “this is as good as it gets.” I think this comes from my father’s preaching advice……. “when you run out of things to say, stop talking.”
I don’t spend time fleshing anything out more than that, because these are training exercises…. or at least, that’s how I see them. I am walking before I run….. this is “couch to 5K.”
Oh, and I almost forgot. Here’s the intro to Oblivion, with Patrick Stewart. As soon as he stops speaking, one of my favorite brass intros in any orchestral starts, called “Reign of the Septims.” This is the kind of music that makes me glad game soundtracks are available so I don’t have to play to enjoy the symphony and/or choir. Even if you don’t play video games, you’ll enjoy this:
To eat, I say my favorite is pork because I like face bacon and all those esoteric things that professional cooks eat. I like offal, but some of it is awful. My advice is that stuff like hearts, brains, and marrow might not taste good to you, but they’ll definitely taste better than kidneys and livers. I don’t eat filters (immortal words from Dana, she’s right tho). I don’t care whether we’re going to Luby’s Cafeteria or a three Michelin star fine dining experience. I am not eating liver and onions, I am not eating it dressed up as $200 fois gras. The only person that has ever gotten me to eat a second bite of fois gras is Gabriel Rucker, head chef of Portland’s Le Pigeon (do not pronounce it in French). It is not “le pigh-jhon”). It didn’t taste any less like an assload of iron, but there was so much more to explore within the flavor. The crisp edges. The raspberry jelly donut. Just….. fuck me. Yet, I still couldn’t get away from the taste of blood, and not even blood. Just the constant taste of a coin in the back of your throat, and it will stick long after you’ve finished. It’d be okay if it was the jelly donut that reappeared………..
I also love the zoo with a deep and abiding passion, particularly in the Spring because it’s free and I can go write there every single day if I want. It’s lovely when it’s between 60-70 degrees….. not so much in August. I pick a table in front of whichever enclosure pleases me, and the animals’ activity makes writing easier. When I go to the zoo, I only sometimes go during tourist season…. but when I do, those days are often invaluable.
There’s a reason for that. Sometimes I am very much in the mood for an overwhelmingly large crowd, because in that space, I am not taking it all in. I wear a baseball cap AND cans, a move score blasting so that I’m only watching the crowd, I’m not listening to it. Sounds trip me up all the time- it’s my sensory issue, from the notifications on my phone that sometimes scare the life out of me to people talking and not realizing they’re talking to me because every sound in the room is equally loud and I do not process voices in the same way I process reading. This is true of most autistic people.
Editor’s Note:
If you are struggling to reach an autistic person, try laying out all your feelings in text. Write them a letter. Use Facebook Messenger. We don’t lack empathy, we lack the ability to process it correctly…… particularly in conversation. Again, voices are hard- so much easier to process it in our own way, get back to you and see if we’ve understood.
I am using it as cover. I learned this from Jonna Mendez, actually, in one of her videos for “Wired” magazine on YouTube (I’ll put one of my favorites at the end- she is so fabulous). The funniest thing ever said in a comment came from someone who understood the assignment. He said, “she was the Chief of Disguise. I was really expecting her to turn into a black dude at the end.” I died for a second, but I know something he doesn’t. The first mask she ever made for herself that actually animated when she put it on was indeed a black dude. In her memory, it was fabulous, but she could not walk it, talk it….. because she is indeed a white woman. 😉
Her next big coup was fooling George H.W. Bush by “borrowing someone else’s face,” and as I result I kidded her in person that we had mutual friends. George H.W. Bush and I used to go to the same church…….. what is really, really amazing is that she fooled him in the Oval and not when he was director of CIA. LEGEND. The other really funny thing is that she got dressed at a friend’s house before they went to the White House, and their dog didn’t like her when she first got there and went apeshit over her in disguise. 😉 Additionally, she was working for Tony when he came up with the quick change…. that you could completely change your look in between 37-45 steps depending on whether Jonna or Tony is telling the story. The funniest part of that whole thing is that Tony and Jonna’s boss was a narcoleptic (I KNOW), and Jonna’s job was to stand at his desk and make sure he was awake the whole time to see Tony do it. He started out as himself, the spy you see in “Argo” played by Ben Affleck (much to my Latinx stepsister’s dismay and humorous consternation).
It didn’t matter who played Tony, because that’s not what was interesting about him……. and also, Tony didn’t care that a Latino didn’t play him The only thing that Jonna noted about Ben’s character had nothing to do with race. It wasn’t public at the time, but Tony had been diagnosed with Parkinson’s and his personality kind of flipped. Ben based the character on that personality because Ben and Tony spent time together. He did not know what Tony was like at the time. She said that he was more effusive with his emotions back then, and that it would have been in some ways a different movie if Ben had known Tony for many years. I’m paraphrasing her, but I am writing in the spirit of what she said. Even still, it wasn’t Tony’s personality that drew me in. He didn’t have to have that personality for me to love him. It was his brain, especially after he and Jonna laid out their thought processes so brilliantly in their books that not only do I have them all on my Kindle, my dad gifted me all of them autographed as keepsakes. And in fact, one of them I bought on my own and she signed it in front of me. It was one of the most significant moments of my life…… because I realized that even if I couldn’t be a spy, I could be them after they retired.
My idea is that I am capable of short stories where I do not feel capable as a novelist. I’d like to write Bond level stories for a chapter, and then lay out the research for why I wrote it. It would be cool to write science fiction like Men in Black, then explore why I picked their ops based on my enormity of reading…. and this is completely separate from my alternate history, because I have had the idea vetted and the red team says it’s huge; it will be a knockout if executed correctly. You can’t get that one out of me because I don’t want to give the idea away to anyone who’d publish a shittier version before I did. This idea is free because it’s universal. No two books written in both fiction and non-fiction would be the same. Even if you’ve read something like it, you’ve never heard it in my voice…… which, I think, would be “Rachel Maddow on the non-fiction parts and an amalgamation of Tony and Jonna when it’s fiction, and also me because they’re not neurodivergent (or I’m not brave enough to ask). I would write that in the inscription, to make it clear that it’s just a character and people shouldn’t attribute my indiosyncracies to her- necessary when you’re writing about someone who is still living and almost certain to read it. Calling someone autistic or coding them that way is not for the faint of heart because I wouldn’t let a dog I didn’t like be treated the way people treat me. It’s not my friends and family. It’s the way I walk in the world…… and I would die of embarrassment if I passed on the “wealth.”
I had to think about that.
In trying to hold a mirror up to the world around me, it often causes me to attribute my own idiosyncracies with someone else. I think I do it the most often with Supergrover because she is a mirror image of me. She emotes too little, and I emote too much. It is indeed the gap between neurotypical and neurodivergent. It causes issues because I tell her how I see the world and she doesn’t return the favor. Therefore, I write from my own echo chamber. We aren’t checking the stories we’re telling ourselves, and that kind of love is harmful to both of us. It is my responsibility to take care of my anxious attachment style. It is her responsibility to interrupt my reality with her story so that I am not basing every decision on what only I think. My self image isn’t strong enough for that. My history is that if I really love someone and they’re being avoidant, I’ll just cave for years on end to avoid ending the relationship.
I became aware that this story was total bullshit and realized that in order for Supergrover and I to move on, I needed a love big enough to silence the voices in my head. I needed her to tell me exactly what was up in her brain when she read it. I am neurodivergent, therefore I take everything literally. Meeting up one day was a “someday, perhaps,” and I waited five years. It wasn’t all because I was holding onto her. It’s that there was a pandemic. Why blame her for something so beyond her control? Alternatively, she didn’t seem to recognize when I shot for the moon and talked about a time in which she was retired and had nowhere to be….. anything from traveling to things neither of us have experienced to showing off our own experiences to the other to just having a damn cup of coffee together instead of in async. In short, I understood the assignment, I’m just establishing my area of operations.
I’m going to have to read “Nuking the Moon” by Vince Houghton, because I love the era of CIA involved in the space race. It is also an alternative title to this blog, apparently……. because having a relationship like ours would feel so relatable to every autistic reader. My friends become my special interest when I write to them. I don’t think of us as potentially falling in love later in life like I did with Dana. Dana and I worked on each other for a while, and she had me the first time she winked at me…… I just only know that in retrospect, because when you’re sapiosexual, someone has to open up to you over time. When you’re autistic, is has to be a forest fire to get you to notice…… and she’ll know exactly where she was when said wink occurred. It was not the same situation with Supergrover because she’s straight and she’s already met her life partner, anyway. I just like being cool enough to know her. It’s why I have no regrets at all right now, I’m just sad.).
Every neurodivergent person I’ve ever met has felt this way. Every single one. I haven’t realized my power in saying things that identify with AuDHD because I didn’t realize the rabbit hole was that deep.
Again, saying all this is not about my beautiful girl and me. It’s how perception of me would affect any character I write whether they’re fictional, living their lives, or dead now but their estate will freak. Any and all of these are bad, I assure you.
I should talk to Cora about this book because she absolutely is a novelist and creates entire fictional worlds. We could say a lot by not saying it at all. In fiction, you do things by showing. I want every character in the book to be neurodivergent and to show it by how they present. The book would basically contain how to communicate with a neurodivergent when they are trying to speak to a neurotypical. I can do this very well with spies because they are drenched in facts, not emotions.
Spies know everything, in my humble opinion. They take in too much information about the world every single day and remember random factoids all day long (e.g. American spies learning how to dress and count in Europe), allowing them to move quickly and quietly as the smartest person in the room. It’s not just Jonna and Tony that have taught me that lesson. It’s everyone I’ve ever met at the International Spy Museum or heard on SpyCast.
Even people who work at the museum are smarter than the average bear. In particular, shout out to Vince Houghton and Dr. Andrew Hammond, who both have served as the host of SpyCast. Otherwise, I would not know all this because I wouldn’t have gotten interested in real-life intelligence over Bond movie magic. Bond is the face of something very, very real…… and it has scared me more than once. I posted on an autism group that my special interest was intelligence, and the comments were varied from “oh, that’s so cool” to “does the American-based “International Spy Museum” have a wing for CoIntelPro?” Jesus God, let’s drag out every bad thing CIA has ever done right off the bat. I do not like those people. I really don’t. That’s because when you dig deep, you see that misses and wins are part of every organization. If the swing for a win is big enough, things are going to go very, very wrong- and faster than anyone would think.
But when I personally think of spies, I think about people like Julia Child, Virginia Hall, Alma Katsu (all OSS/CIA, but Virginia Hall also worked for MI-6 before she came to us), John le Carré (David Cornwell, MI-6, also a fiction author), and Jack Barsky (KGB). In terms of fiction, I’m not a Bond fan until we’re talking about the current set of movies, because the old ones are dated and incredibly misogynistic. (Pussy Galore? COME ON.). My favorite M is obviously Judi Dench, my favorite C is Stephen Fry in “Doctor Who.” And if I had to give an award to any intelligence officer in a fictional universe, there are two. I love K from MiB (“I never worked for a funeral home.”) and Carmen Sandiego (“Fedora the Explorer”).
In some ways, “Argo” is also a fictional universe because reel bears little resemblance to real. For instance, Alan Arkin’s character is completely made up, but John Goodman’s isn’t. John Chambers, his character, went on to do other sci-fi movies and his last one was “The Island of Doctor Moreau.” That being said, “Argo” is not Tony’s best book. It’s tremendous, but “The Moscow Rules” is better.
I think this is because in ’79 I was two. I don’t remember the hostage crisis in Iran. I very, very much remember “Mr. President, tear down that wall.” If you are not familiar, there used ot be a wall dividing East and West Germany. The dividing line was in Berlin. West Berlin had all the benefits of democracy and capitalism. East Berlin was controlled by communism, so this was a direct appeal by Ronald Reagan to Mikhail Gorbachev. In reality, Reagan and George H.W. Bush probably advanced the wall coming down by roughly 11 days. That’s hyperbole, but it’s the funniest line about the Cold War I’ve read so far (no past or present government employee said this; I was researching a paper in college for International Affairs.). Jonna and Tony were instrumental in all of this, protecting their assets and underlings like their own children. They also came up with two pieces of spy technology that changed the direction of the war…. and I’m saying it, they didn’t. They’re too humble.
Speaking of children, the first thing they came up with was called a “Jack in the Box.” It was literally a large version of the toy. This is because all the spies in Tony’s department (he was Chief of Disguise then) were taught that there is no distinguishable difference between espionage and magic. The area of operation is your “stage,” or your ring depending on the size of the circus. There are two operations going on at the same time. The first is that you’re trying to pop smoke (military slang for creating a distraction). The second is that you are actively saying to the crown, “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”
Apt.
When CIA got a new building, they covered it in green glass. I don’t know what they called Langley before it was built as a code name/slang, but now it’s “Oz” (I don’t think Tony came up with it, but that’s on brand for him, clearly). In fact, one of the things that marks me as an intelligence superfan is that in “Argo,” Ben Affleck runs through the old building and ends up standing on the famous seal in the new one. I don’t know if you know that, but I know like five people who would know that…… and now I’m wondering if Zac is one of them.
ADHD moment- Zac is not a spy, but he works with the data they collect. He’s been in intelligence since he joined the military, which in my mind makes him a great boyfriend and a lucky bastard all at once. 😛 Unfortunately, he does not have the kind of badge where he can escort visitors, but he’s lucky that he doesn’t. I would have asked him to take me to a wide assortment of gift shops…………………… repeatedly. I’m lucky, though, because he remembers me when he goes. My baseball cap and “nightgown” are from the one at CIA (by nightgown I mean a CIA t-shirt that’s way too big on me), my sweat pants are from the one at the Pentagon, and I have a t-shirt from, I think, the one at DIA that’s for little kids (it’s my favorite). Interestingly enough, I don’t wear my intelligence/military shit all the time because they’re so great. It’s an added bonus that all their shit vibes with my sensory issues. If I ever find out who makes their clothes, I’d also buy a ton of stuff without the logo. This is because it doesn’t happen often, but sometimes I get treated like a human comment section. Not all of them are nice. The best one was from a tween who pulled on my coat and said, “Do you work there? I want to be CIA, too.” I freaked out because she was the most beautiful girlchilde……. a future Alpha Kappa Alpha that could one day be Tracy Walder. And by freaked out I mean that this was on the Metro platform so my emotions and sensory perception were already turned up to hell and I just cried. Flat out. But it was after she walked away. The last thing I wanted to do was freak her out, too. It was good that we were in such a public place.
When you think everyone is watching, turns out no one is.
To the rest of the world, this comes across as hilarious. To me, I just stare and quote Sarah Silverman on Jimmy Kimmel. That if she had kids, she’d tell them that “mommy believes she’s one of God’s chosen people, and daddy believes Jesus is magic.” Not sure he’s ever been compared to Jesus, but he’s a Moses in “Argo.” Sarah’s argument is valid for both of us.
Again, what I’ve learned from Jonna and Tony is moving in a crowd with my sensory issues muted by headphones and having my head covered. I can get lost in my own little world, and I generally want to because conversation is difficult for me when every noise feels the same and often drowns them out.
I was going to the zoo that day. I found that I love giraffes and kept going with my day. Not going to see me walking one down Connecticut because the zoo had “Adoption Day.” And, I would have to check with all of them, but I do not have room for a giraffe and (correct me if I’m wrong) neither do Zac, Supergrover & Michael, or Bryn & Dave. I do know enough to know that Zac, Michael, and Dave would have to convince me, Supergrover, and Bryn that no, we do not need a giraffe (they both have a heart that beats for animals). Also, I cannot afford to relocate both myself and a giraffe to Oregon. It would be easier to make friends with an Oregonian giraffe, which is a whole mood.
What would it look like to be an Oregonian giraffe? They don’t wear patchouli essential oil or hemp flip flops, do they? The only thing I know about Oregon giraffes is that they probably love The Indigo Girls. I do not say this lightly, actually, because The Indigo Girls have consistently been one of the best concerts at the zoo over the years. There’s no way that the animals don’t like the music, at least in some cases….. and Indigo Girls play acoustic just enough of the time that I can’t see how it would get on their nerves as much as electric. I love how I have worked all of this out in my head…….
If you’ve never been to the zoo in Oregon for a concert, it’s like going to Miller Outdoor Theater or Cynthia Mitchell Woods Pavillion in Houston or Wolf Trap in DC. Primates and parrots can both sing “Get Out the Map” by now. I would have enjoyed teaching it to Kevin, who is a giraffe.
Kevin and I used to hang out. The way his enclosure was built, there was a table with a bench bolted to the ground right in front of him. Like, I couldn’t reach out and pet him, but akin to being in the same bedroom or kitchen. Space, but not much of it. He always sat right in front of me, as if he knew he was my inspiration, posing for a portrait…… yet a devilish one. I have never seen a giraffe roll their eyes, but I liked to imagine that Kevin did. It fit the theme. If wishes were giraffes, writers would ride.I just called him that and now I can’t remember why. But anyway, I thought of us as tight because he heard about the rough drafts of so much that’s here now.
It’s not his real name. I was just gathering intel and needed a codename for my asset.
Stories That Are All True 