Every tech keynote right now is the same performance: a parade of enterprise apps being “reimagined with AI.” Word gets a sidebar. Excel gets a sidebar. Outlook gets a sidebar. PowerPoint gets a sidebar that can now generate slides that look like every other AI‑generated slide. It’s all very shiny, very corporate, and very determined to convince you that the future of computing is happening inside productivity software.
But that’s not where the real shift is.
The real shift — the one that actually changes how you operate a computer — is happening at the shell level. Not in the apps. Not in the UI. In the thing that sits between you and the OS: PowerShell, Bash, zsh, whatever your poison is. The moment the shell becomes conversational, the entire stack above it becomes optional decoration.
And the funny part is: this isn’t even a moonshot. It’s an architectural adjustment.
You don’t need a giant model with root access. You need a tiny, local, system‑aware model that lives on the machine and a reasoning model that lives wherever it makes sense. The small model doesn’t think. It doesn’t write. It doesn’t summarize. It doesn’t hallucinate. It does one job: read the system and normalize it.
Think of it as a structured Get‑* layer with a brainstem.
It can read the current working directory. It can list files and directories. It can read file metadata like size, timestamps, and permissions. It can query running processes. It can read CPU, RAM, disk, and battery metrics. It can inspect network connections. It can check which ports are open. It can see which modules are installed.
And then it outputs a small, consistent, structured blob — essentially JSON — that says things like: “cwd: C:\Users\Leslie\Documents\Projects\Heard,” “files: […]”, “processes: […]”, “metrics: { cpu: 0.32, ram_used_gb: 11.2, disk_free_gb: 18 }.”
No prose. No interpretation. Just truth.
On top of that, you wire in the reasoning model — the thing that can understand natural language like “What directory are we in again,” or “Append this to notes.txt,” or “Move everything older than 2024 into Archive,” or “What’s eating my RAM.”
The reasoning model doesn’t need direct system access. It just needs two things: the structured snapshot from the tiny local model, and a way to emit actions back into PowerShell.
That’s the key: you don’t let the big model run wild on your machine. You let it propose actions in a constrained, inspectable format. Something like: “action: append_file, path: C:\Users\Leslie\Documents\Projects\Heard\notes.txt, content: ‘New line of text here.’” And then PowerShell — not the model — executes that action.
So the loop looks like this:
You speak: “Append this to notes.txt.”
PowerShell captures the utterance and sends it to the reasoning model, along with a snapshot from the tiny local model: current directory, file list, relevant metadata.
The reasoning model decides which file you meant, whether it exists, whether appending is appropriate, and what content to write.
The model emits a structured action. No free‑form shell commands. No arbitrary code. Just a constrained action schema.
PowerShell validates and executes: checks path, checks permissions, writes to file, returns success or failure.
You get a conversational response: “Appended one line to notes.txt in C:\Users\Leslie\Documents\Projects\Heard.”
That’s it. That’s the architecture. No magic. No “AI with root.” Just a disciplined division of labor.
Now scale that pattern.
You want system diagnostics? The tiny local model reads Get‑Process, Get‑Counter, Get‑Item on key paths, hardware and battery info, and performance counters for CPU, RAM, disk, and network. It hands the reasoning model a snapshot like: top processes by CPU and memory, disk usage by volume, battery health, thermal state, network connections.
You say: “Why is my fan loud.”
The reasoning model sees CPU at 92 percent, one process using 78 percent, temps elevated, disk fine, RAM fine. It responds: “Your CPU is under heavy load. The main culprit is chrome.exe using 78 percent CPU. That’s why your fan is loud. Do you want me to kill it, or just watch it for now.”
If you say “kill it,” the model emits a structured action like “stop_process: 12345.” PowerShell runs Stop‑Process. You stay in control.
Same pattern for cleanup.
The tiny local model inspects temp directories, browser caches (if allowed), old log files, the recycle bin, and large files in common locations. It hands the reasoning model a summary: temp files 1.2 GB, browser cache 800 MB, logs 600 MB, recycle bin 3.4 GB.
You say: “Free up at least 2GB without touching system files or browser sessions.”
The reasoning model decides to clear temp files, clear logs, and empty the recycle bin while leaving browser cache alone. It emits a set of structured actions. PowerShell executes each with guardrails. You get a summary: “I freed 2.7GB: temp files, old logs, and the recycle bin. I left browser sessions intact.”
That’s CCleaner, but honest. And reversible. And inspectable.
Now apply it to development.
The tiny local model reads Git status, current branch, last few commits, and the presence of common tools. You say: “What branch am I on, and what changed since main.” The reasoning model sees the branch, the diff, and the changed files. It responds in plain language and can emit actions like staging specific files, committing with a message you approve, or stashing before a risky operation.
Again: the model doesn’t run Git directly. It proposes actions. PowerShell executes.
The pattern repeats everywhere: network introspection, security posture checks, Office document manipulation, log analysis, environment management. In every case, the architecture is the same: local model observes and normalizes, reasoning model interprets and proposes, the shell validates and executes, and you decide.
This is why the real AI revolution isn’t in Word. Word is just one client. Outlook is just one client. Teams is just one client. The shell is the thing that sits at the center of the machine, touching everything, orchestrating everything, and historically doing it with text commands and muscle memory.
Give that shell a conversational layer — backed by a tiny local model for truth and a reasoning model for intent — and you don’t just add AI to computing. You change what computing is.
You stop using apps and start telling the system what you want. You stop treating AI like a remote consultant and start treating it like a buddy on the box. You stop pretending the future is in sidebars and admit it’s in the thing that’s been here since the beginning: the shell.
And once that clicks, all the Copilot‑in‑Word demos start to look like what they are: nice, but not fundamental. The real tectonic shift is lower. Closer to the metal. Closer to you.
It’s in the shell.
Scored by Copilot. Conducted by Leslie Lanagan.
Stories That Are All True 